[2018] KEELRC 1281 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had properly withdrawn Cause No. 1099 of 2017, as evidenced by the stamped notices of withdrawal and acknowledgment by the respondent. Consequently, the doctrine of res judicata did not apply since there was no determination on the merits in the previous cause. However, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1281 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Job Omondi Ouma; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 165 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Application
- Outcome
- Application deemed as a claim; directions issued for regularization of pleadings.
- Judges
- DO Ogal
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Withdrawal of Claim, Procedural Irregularity
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Job Omondi Ouma
Applicant
Kenya Revenue Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's previous claim (Cause No. 1099 of 2017) was properly withdrawn.
- 2 Whether the present miscellaneous application is properly before the court as a claim.
- 3 Whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to bar the current proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had properly withdrawn Cause No. 1099 of 2017, as evidenced by the stamped notices of withdrawal and acknowledgment by the respondent. Consequently, the doctrine of res judicata did not apply since there was no determination on the merits in the previous cause. However, the court held that a claim cannot be founded on a miscellaneous application, as proper procedure requires the filing of a memorandum of claim. Recognizing the applicant's status as a self-represented litigant and invoking the principles of substantive justice under Article 159(2) of the Constitution and Section 20(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, the court exercised...
Court Disposition
Application deemed as a claim; directions issued for regularization of pleadings.
Orders
- The application is deemed to be a claim.
- The claimant is directed to file a memorandum of claim within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
MISC. APPLICATION NO. 165 OF 2017
(Before Hon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango)
JOB OMONDI OUMA..............................APPLICANT
-Versus-
KENYA REVENUE AUTHORITY.....RESPONDENT
RULING
What is before me for determination is the claimant’s application dated 22nd November 2017. While perusing the file for purposes of writing the ruling it came to my attention that the claimant filed only a miscellaneous application filed by way of notice of motion.
I have also considered the replying affidavit filed by the respondent in which it is alleged that the claimant did not withdraw Cause No. 1099 of 2017 and that this suit is res judicata.
The copies of the notice to Act in person and notice of withdrawal of claim both of which are dated 6th November 2017 annexed to the supplementary affidavit of the claimant filed on 15th February 2018 have court stamps of the same date as well as the respondent’s stamp acknowledging receipt also dated 6th November 2017. I am therefor satisfied that the applicant’s Claim No. 1099 of 2017 was properly withdrawn.
The issue of res judicata does not therefore arise as it would only have been applicable if Cause 1099 of 2017 was determined on the merits by the court.
I am however of the view that the applicant’s suit is not properly before the court as a claim cannot be founded on a miscellaneous application. I believe that the withdrawal of Cause 1099 of 2017 and the filing of the miscellaneous application herein was informed by the ruling in REPUBLIC -V- CABINET SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH & 2 OTHERS Ex-Parte Elizabeth Awino Onyango which was a judicial review application.
Taking into account that the claimant is not an advocate and is acting in person and applying the principles in Article 159(2) of the Constitution and Section 20(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, I direct that this application be deemed to be a claim and direct the claimant to file a memorandum of claim within 14 days.
The respondent will file a defence to the claim within 14 days of service. The suit will be mentioned on a date to be fixed at the time of delivery of this ruling for further directions.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018
MAUREEN ONYANGO
JUDGE