[2023] KEHC 27523 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's costs had been taxed and certified at Ksh. 220,050, and the certificate of taxation had not been set aside or altered. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate is final as to the amount due. The applicant was entitled to judgment for the certified sum. Regarding...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 27523 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joe Ngigi & Co Advocates LLP; Respondent: Kenya Alliance Insurance Co Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E160 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the certified taxed costs, with interest and costs of the application awarded.
- Judges
- F Wangari
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joe Ngigi & Co Advocates LLP
Applicant
Kenya Alliance Insurance Co Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the certified taxed costs against the respondent.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs and from what date.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's costs had been taxed and certified at Ksh. 220,050, and the certificate of taxation had not been set aside or altered. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate is final as to the amount due. The applicant was entitled to judgment for the certified sum. Regarding interest, Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order entitles the advocate to interest at 14% per annum from one month after delivery of the bill, but as there was no evidence of when the bill was served, interest would accrue from the date of the certificate of costs. The applicant was also entitled to costs of the application, as costs follow the event and there was no...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the certified taxed costs, with interest and costs of the application awarded.
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent for Kshs. 220,050.
- Interest on the above sum to accrue at the rate of 14% per annum with effect from 3/2/2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Joe Ngigi & Co Advocates LLP v Kenya Alliance Insurance Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E160 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 27523 (KLR) (22 September 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 27523 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Miscellaneous Civil Application E160 of 2022
F Wangari, J
September 22, 2023
Between
Joe Ngigi & Co Advocates LLP
Advocate
and
Kenya Alliance Insurance Co Ltd
Client
Ruling
1. The Applicant vide a Notice of Motion dated 6/2/ 2023 and filed on date 8/2/ 2023 sought for the following orders: -a.That judgment be entered in favor of the Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kenya Shillings Two Hundred and Twenty Thousand and Fifty ( Kshs. 220,050/=) being the certified costs due to the Applicant as against the Respondent.b.That the Respondent does pay to the Applicant the cost of this application together with interest on the taxed sum.
2. The application was based on grounds inter alia that the Advocate-Client costs due to the Applicant were taxed at Ksh. 220,050/= where the Respondent has neglected or refused to settle.
3. The application was served upon the Respondent and an affidavit of Service dated 14/2/2023 was filed. The Respondent did not file his response. The matter was fixed down for hearing. Hearing notice was issued, but he did not appear. The application was heard ex-parte. Submissions were filed by the Applicant.
Analysis and Determination 4. I have considered the application, the supporting affidavit and the annexures thereto;a.Whether the application is meritorious;b.What is the order as to costs?
5. I have perused through the proceedings. Certificate of Taxation was issued on 3/2/2023 for Ksh. 220,050/=. Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act reads: -‘The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the Court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the Court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs’.
6. Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order provides that: -‘An advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, provided that such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill shall have been paid or tendered in full.’
7. The Certificate issued by the Taxing officer was never set aside. The issue now is on the interest payable. From Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, the Applicant is entitled to interest of costs at a rate of 14% per annum after the expiration of one month from the delivery of the bill of costs to the client.
8. I have perused through the court documents. There is nothing to indicate when the Bill of Costs was served upon the Respondents. In the absence of the same, the interest shall run from the date when the Certificate of Costs was issued i.e. 3/2/2023.
9. On the issue of costs, it is settled that the same follows the event. That is the import of Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act. The court reserves its discretion on whether to award costs to either party. This was well enunciated by the Supreme Court in the case of Jasbir Singh Rai & 3 others v Tarlochan Singh Rai Estate of & 4 others [2013] eKLR. In the present circumstances, I thus see no reason why I should deny the Applicant costs of the application.
10. Following the foregone discourse, the upshot is that the following orders do hereby issue: -a.That judgement is entered in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent, for Kshs. 220,050/=b.Interest on (a) above do accrue at the rate of 14% per annum, with effect from 3/2/2023. c.Costs awarded to the Applicant.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MOMBASA, THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023. ………………………………..F. WANGARIJUDGEIn the presence of:Mutuku Advocate h/b for Ngigi Advocate for the ApplicantN/A for the RespondentBarile, Court Assistant