[2025] KEHC 8082 (KLR)
The court found that the two miscellaneous applications arose from the same cause of action—non-payment of legal fees for services rendered by the applicant to the respondent. Both matters had been taxed and certificates of taxation issued, which had not been set aside or varied. The retainer was not disputed. Under...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 8082 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joe Ngigi & Co Advocates LLP; Respondent: Trident Insurance Co Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Naivasha
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E181 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Consolidation and Entry of Judgment on Certified Costs
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Matters consolidated. Judgment entered for applicant for net certified costs after deduction of down payment. Costs and interest awarded.
- Judges
- GL Nzioka
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Fees, Consolidation of Suits, Entry of Judgment on Certified Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joe Ngigi & Co Advocates LLP
Applicant
Trident Insurance Co Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Consolidation and Entry of Judgment on Certified Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to consolidation of the two related miscellaneous applications arising from the same cause of action.
- 2 Whether judgment should be entered for the applicant for the certified costs as per the certificates of taxation.
- 3 Whether the respondent is entitled to a deduction for the down payment made towards the legal fees.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the two miscellaneous applications arose from the same cause of action—non-payment of legal fees for services rendered by the applicant to the respondent. Both matters had been taxed and certificates of taxation issued, which had not been set aside or varied. The retainer was not disputed. Under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificates of taxation are final as to the amount of costs, and the court is empowered to enter judgment for the certified sum where the retainer is not in dispute. The respondent's claim of a down payment was accepted and deducted from the total certified costs, resulting in a net sum due. The court ordered consolidation of the...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Matters consolidated. Judgment entered for applicant for net certified costs after deduction of down payment. Costs and interest awarded.
Orders
- Naivasha HCCMISC APP No. E181 of 2023 and Naivasha HCCMISC APP No. E014 of 2024 are consolidated.
- Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs. 263,092 being the certified costs after deduction of Kshs. 47,500 paid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Joe Ngigi & Co Advocates LLP v Trident Insurance Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E181 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 8082 (KLR) (9 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 8082 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Naivasha
Miscellaneous Civil Application E181 of 2023
GL Nzioka, J
June 9, 2025
Between
Joe Ngigi & Co Advocates Llp
Applicant
and
Trident Insurance Co Ltd
Respondent
Ruling
1. By a notice of motion dated 25th October 2024 brought under section 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 3 Rule 5, and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all other enabling provisions of the law, the applicant is seeking for the following ordersa.That the Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order consolidating this matter with Naivasha HCCMISC APP No. E014 of 2024b.That Judgment be entered herein in favour of the applicant against the respondent for an all-inclusive sum of Kshs 310,592 only being the certified costs in Naivasha HCCMISC No. E181 of 2023 (Kshs 176,100) and Naivasha HCCMISC No. E014 of 2024 (Kshs 134,492), due to the applicant as against the respondent.c.That the respondent does pay to the applicant to costs of this application together with interest on the taxed sum from the date of taxation.
2. The application is based on the following grounds and supported by the affidavit of Erick M. Kinoti and on further or other grounds to be adduced at the hearing hereof that: -a.That the above captioned miscellaneous suits arose from the same cause of action being taxation matters in which the applicant herein filed Advocate/Client Bill of Costs seeking compensation from the respondent for having failed to pay the applicant’s legal fees.b.That this matter is thus related to Naivasha HCCMISC APP. No. E014 of 2024 as they all arose from the same cause of action being non-payment of legal fees and was filed by the same applicant against the same respondent.c.That the aforementioned cases the matters were duly taxed by the Taxing Master and certificate of taxation issued to that effect.d.That the said suits therefore involve similar questions of fact and/or law.e.That it is thus in the interest of justice that the said suit be consolidated with the present one for purposes of hearing and determination.f.That it is in the interest of time and other related factors that the applicant seeks for these matters to be dealt with jointly.g.That it is in the best interest of justice that the application be allowed as prayed
3. Upon considering the application the court directed that it be heard orally on 22nd October 2024. On that date the court was informed that, the respondent had been served but was absent. However, noting the matter was related to HCCMISC E014 of 2024 the court ordered both be and were subsequently consolidated.
4. On 12th February 2025 the court was informed that the respondent was served but was absent. However, the court noted a replying affidavit dated 30th January 2025 sworn by James Onjoro a legal officer of the respondent’s company. In a nutshell the respondent stated it had made a down payment of Kshs. 47,500 vide cheque number 017485 dated 2nd February 2021 which should be deducted from to the sum of Kshs. 310,529 leaving a balance of Kshs. 263,092. That, on a without prejudice basis the applicant is entitled to a sum of Kshs. 263,092, which the Garnishee can set aside from the respondent’s pay bill.
5. The matter was stood over to 2nd April 2025 for oral hearing but the respondent did not appear in court and the oral hearing was dispensed with and matter set down for ruling.
6. Having considered materials availed I note a letter dated 15th September 2021 in which the respondent instructed the applicant to represent it in matter Naivasha CMCC No. 408 of 2021. Also provided is a certificate of taxation dated 12th July 2024 issued in Miscellaneous Application No. E181 of 2023, in the sum of Kshs 176,100 and a certificate of taxation of even date issued in Miscellaneous Application No. E014 of 2024 the sum of Kshs 134,492
7. Notably the said certificates have not been set aside and/or varied. In the same vein the retainer is not disputed. The provisions of section 51(2) of Advocates Act states: -“The certificate of a taxing officer by whom it has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the court, be final as to the amount of costs covered thereby, and the court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.”
8. As regards interest on the taxed amount, there is no evidence the taxed amount was requested for the request declined. Interest is awarded from date of this order.
9. The applicant will also have costs of this application.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2025GRACE L. NZIOKAJUDGERuling delivered virtually in absence of the partied