[2024] KEHC 10984 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established that the respondent was served with the bill of costs and notice of taxation, the bill was taxed at Kshs. 158,922, and a certificate of taxation was issued on 7th August 2023. The respondent did not challenge, set aside, or appeal the certificate, nor was there any...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 10984 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joe Ngigi & Company Advocates LLP; Respondent: Kenyan Alliance Insurance Company Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Naivasha
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E043 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- judgment for the applicant
- Judges
- GL Nzioka
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Remuneration, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joe Ngigi & Company Advocates LLP
Applicant
Kenyan Alliance Insurance Company Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether judgment should be entered for the applicant based on a certificate of taxation that has not been set aside, altered, or appealed against.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs and from what date.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established that the respondent was served with the bill of costs and notice of taxation, the bill was taxed at Kshs. 158,922, and a certificate of taxation was issued on 7th August 2023. The respondent did not challenge, set aside, or appeal the certificate, nor was there any dispute as to retainer. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act makes such a certificate final as to the amount of costs, and the court is empowered to enter judgment for the certified sum. Regarding interest, the court held that Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order entitles the advocate to interest at 14% per annum from one month after service of the bill, which in this case...
Court Disposition
judgment for the applicant
Orders
- Judgment entered for the applicant in the sum of Kshs. 158,922.
- Interest at 14% per annum from 25th June 2023 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
Joe Ngigi & Company Advocates LLP v Kenyan Alliance Insurance Company Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E043 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 10984 (KLR) (16 September 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 10984 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Naivasha
Miscellaneous Civil Application E043 of 2023
GL Nzioka, J
September 16, 2024
Between
Joe Ngigi & Company Advocates Llp
Applicant
and
Kenyan Alliance Insurance Company Ltd
Respondent
Ruling
1. By a notice of motion application dated 14th March 2024, brought under the provisions of; section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act (Cap 16) Laws of Kenya, the applicant is seeking for the following orders: -a.That judgment be entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent for the sum of Kenya Shillings One Hundred and Fifty Eight Thousand and Nine Hundred and Twenty (Kshs. 158,922) only being the certified costs due to the applicant as against the respondent.b.That the respondent pay to the applicant the costs of this application together with interest on the taxed sum.
2. The application is supported by the grounds on the face of it and an affidavit sworn by Joseph N. Ngigi, an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya and the proprietor of the applicant’s firm.
3. He deposes that, the respondent instructed the applicant’s firm to act for it in Naivasha Chief Magistrate Civil Case No. E052 of 2020 Susan Wairimu Mwangi (minor suing through her next friend Teresiah Njeri Mwangi) vs Kenyan Alliance Insurance Company Limited.
4. That the matter was fully heard and determined. However, the respondent failed to pay the legal fees thus necessitating the filing of a bill of costs. That the bill was subsequently taxed in the sum of Kshs. 158,922 and a certificate of taxation dated 7th August 2023 issued.
5. That despite the fact that the certificate of taxation has not been appealed against, set aside, and/or altered and respondent’s knowledge of the taxed costs, the respondent has refused, failed and/or neglected to settle the taxed amount.
6. The applicant thus argues that, in the given circumstances, it is only fair and just that judgment be entered against the respondent as prayed for together with interest.
7. Upon considering the application, the court ordered that, the same be served for hearing on 7th May, 2024. On the material date, the applicant informed the court that it had served the respondent however, there was no evidence of service. The matter was then set for hearing on 17th June, 2024 and the applicant directed to serve the respondent afresh.
8. However, the 17th June 2024 was declared a public holiday and the matter was stood over to the 18th July, 2024. The respondent was served with a hearing notice as evidenced by the affidavit sworn by Timothy Maxwel Oyombera on 2nd July 2024. However, the respondent did not appear on the scheduled date.
9. Be that as it were, I have considered the application in the light of the materials availed and the application is anchored on the provisions of section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, which states that: -The certificate of a taxing officer by whom it has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the court, be final as to the amount of costs covered thereby, and the court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs
10. In support of its application, the applicant has produced evidence of the certificate of taxation issued on 7th August, 2023. It suffices to note that it has not been set aside nor varied and neither is there a dispute on retainer in this matter. Therefore, there no good reason to decline to issue the orders sought.
11. As regards interest, it suffices to note that the provisions of section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act do not provide for interest. However, Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order provides that: -An advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, provided that such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill shall have been paid or tendered in full.
12. In the instant matter, a perusal of the court record reveals that, the bill of costs and a notice of taxation was served upon the respondent on 24th May, 2023 as evidenced by an affidavit of service sworn by Dickson Kariuki on 25th May, 2023.
13. Therefore, interest is payable one (1) from the date of service of the same, being the 25th day of June, 2023. till payment in full.
14. In conclusion, I enter judgment for the appellant in the sum of Kshs. 158,922 plus interest at 14% with effect from 25th June 2023 until payment in full. Costs of the application are awarded to the applicant.
15. It is so ordered
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED ON THIS 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024GRACE L NZIOKAJUDGEIn the presence of:Ms Mwangi for the applicantNo appearance for the RespondentMr Komen: Court Assistant