[2025] KEHC 3047 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant acted for the respondent, the Bill of Costs was duly served and not challenged, and the Certificate of Taxation was not set aside, appealed, or altered. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act makes the certificate final as to the amount of costs. The applicant is therefore entitled to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 3047 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joe Ngigi & Company Advocates LLP; Respondent: Trident Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E272 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for certified costs with interest and costs
- Judges
- PN Gichohi
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment on Certified Costs, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joe Ngigi & Company Advocates LLP
Applicant
Trident Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the certified costs as per the Certificate of Taxation.
- 2 Whether interest on the taxed costs is payable and from what date.
- 3 Whether the respondent has challenged or set aside the Certificate of Taxation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant acted for the respondent, the Bill of Costs was duly served and not challenged, and the Certificate of Taxation was not set aside, appealed, or altered. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act makes the certificate final as to the amount of costs. The applicant is therefore entitled to judgment for the certified sum. Further, under Paragraph 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, the applicant is entitled to interest at 14% per annum from thirty days after service of the application, as the demand for interest was made and payment was not made within the stipulated period. The respondent's failure to respond or attend court further supports granting the...
Court Disposition
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for certified costs with interest and costs
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent in the sum of Kshs. 156,000 together with interest at 14% per annum calculable after 30 days from the date of service of the application until payment in full.
- The applicant is at liberty to execute the judgment against the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
Joe Ngigi & Company Advocates LLP v Trident Insurance Company Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application E272 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 3047 (KLR) (17 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3047 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Miscellaneous Civil Application E272 of 2023
PN Gichohi, J
March 17, 2025
Between
Joe Ngigi & Company Advocates Llp
Applicant
and
Trident Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. Vide a Notice of Motion dated 8th March 2024 and brought under Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act, the Advocate /Applicant seeks Orders that judgment be entered in his favour for the sum of Kshs. 156,000/= being the certified costs due to the Applicant against the Respondent.
2. He also seeks costs of this application together with interest on the taxed sum from the date of taxation. In the Affidavit sworn on 8th March 2024 by Joseph N. Ngigi , the Applicant states that the Respondent instructed the firm of Joe Ngigi & Co. Advocates LLP to act for the Defendant in Nakuru CMCC. No. 303 of 2020 Milkah Gathoni Maina vs Paddy Distributors Ltd & Joyce Wangui Wachira & Nakuru Cement Supplier.
3. However, the Respondent failed to pay the Applicant’s legal fees thus necessitating the Applicant to file a Bill of Costs dated 10th August, 2023, which was taxed at Kshs. 156,000/= vide a Ruling delivered by Hon. Christine Menya(DR) dated 24th January 2023. Subsequently, the Taxing Officer issued a Certificate of Taxation dated 6th March, 2024 in favour of the Applicant for the sum of Kshs. 156,000/=.
4. That the Certificate of Costs has not been set aside, Appealed or altered by the Court. In the circumstances, the Applicant urged this Court to allow the application as prayed.
Determination 5. After considering this application and the annexures thereto, the only issue for determination is whether the application herein has met the legal threshold to warrant the orders sought.
6. There is evidence on record that indeed, the Applicant duly acted for the Respondent in the above stated case as confirmed by the letter of instructions from the Respondent dated 30th August, 2021.
7. The Applicant’s /Advocate /Client Bill of Costs dated 10th August, 2023 and a Notice dated 1st September 2023were duly served on the Respondent but he did not respond or attend court for the taxation. The Bill was therefore not challenged.
8. It is also noted that despite being served with this application on 5th December, 2024 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Service, the Respondent did not file any response and did not attend this Court either. The Certificate of Costs has not been set aside and there are no outstanding proceedings to set it aside. It has not been stayed or appealed against.
9. Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act provides that:-“The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the Court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the Court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.”
10. In the circumstances, the Certificate of Taxation dated 10th January 2023 is therefore final and the Applicant should be allowed to enjoy the fruits of his labour by entering judgment in the sum of Kshs. 156,000/= as sought.
11. Further, paragraph 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order provides that:“An advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, provided that such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill shall have been paid or tendered in full.”
12. This Court has also noted the Applicant’s demand letter to the Respondent dated 18th July 2023 notifying the Respondent of the Applicant’s right to charge interest if payment is not made within 30 days of the date thereof.
13. In the circumstances, application dated 8th March 2024 is allowed in the following terms:-1. Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of the Applicant as against the Respondent in the sum of Ksh. 156,000/= together with interest thereon at fourteen (14%) per cent per annum calculable after Thirty (30) days from the date when this application was served upon the Respondent until payment in full.2. The Applicant is at liberty to execute the same as against the Respondent.3. Costs are awarded to the Applicant.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025. PATRICIA GICHOHIJUDGEIn the presence of:Mr. Kering for Advocate/ApplicantN/A for the Client/RespondentRuto, Court Assistant*