[2021] KEELC 116 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 116 (KLR)

The court found that Captain Jotham Odera, acting as agent for the respondents, was aware of the court order restraining eviction and taking possession of the suit property, as the order was made in the presence of his advocate, the Attorney General. Despite this, he took possession of the property, which...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 116 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Johannes Akelo Omboto; Applicant: Graduce Omboto Akelo; Respondent: Kenya Railways Corporation; Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary, Minister of Interior & Coordination of National Security; Respondent: The Attorney General; Respondent: The Kenya Ports Authority; Respondent: National Lands Commission
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 8 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
application for committal for contempt allowed
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Interlocutory Orders, Eviction Proceedings, Status Quo Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Interlocutory Orders Eviction Proceedings Status Quo Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johannes Akelo Omboto

Applicant

Graduce Omboto Akelo

Applicant

Kenya Railways Corporation

Respondent

The Cabinet Secretary, Minister of Interior & Coordination of National Security

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

The Kenya Ports Authority

Respondent

National Lands Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether Captain Jotham Odera was aware of and served with the court order restraining eviction and taking possession of the suit property.
  2. 2 Whether Captain Jotham Odera acted in contempt of the court order by taking possession of the suit property.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to committal orders against Captain Jotham Odera for contempt of court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Captain Jotham Odera, acting as agent for the respondents, was aware of the court order restraining eviction and taking possession of the suit property, as the order was made in the presence of his advocate, the Attorney General. Despite this, he took possession of the property, which constituted a clear act of contempt. The court held that the applicants had satisfied the burden of proof for contempt, and that compliance with court orders is fundamental to the rule of law. The court therefore ordered the committal of Captain Jotham Odera to prison for 30 days, with an alternative of a fine, and directed immediate compliance with the original restraining order.

Court Disposition

application for committal for contempt allowed

Orders

  • Captain Jotham Odera is committed to prison for a term of 30 days with an option of a fine of Kshs. 200,000.
  • The original court order restraining eviction and taking possession of the suit property must be complied with immediately.