[2025] KEELC 3255 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 3255 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants and Respondent jointly purchased the suit property and contributed equally to its acquisition. The registration of the property in the Respondent's name as trustee was not intended to create a permanent trust, but was a matter of convenience. There being no opposition from the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 3255 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Okoth Akumu John; Applicant: Kayugira Lincoln Ilatsia; Applicant: Patrick Esendi Masitsa; Applicant: Symon Kieme Thuo; Applicant: Ashioya Laban Etindi; Respondent: Mathew Mohammed Okusimba Omonyo; Interested Party: Chairperson, Limuru Lands Control Board; Interested Party: Kiambu County Land Registrar
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Thika
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E001 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Originating Summons
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
JM Onyango
Legal Topics
Trust Dissolution, Joint Ownership, Land Registration, Land Control Board Consent
Source Language
en
Land and Property Trust Dissolution Joint Ownership Land Registration Land Control Board Consent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Okoth Akumu John

Applicant

Kayugira Lincoln Ilatsia

Applicant

Patrick Esendi Masitsa

Applicant

Symon Kieme Thuo

Applicant

Ashioya Laban Etindi

Applicant

Mathew Mohammed Okusimba Omonyo

Respondent

Chairperson, Limuru Lands Control Board

Interested Party

Kiambu County Land Registrar

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Originating Summons

  1. 1 Whether the trust created in favour of the Respondent over L.R No. Ndeiya/ Makutano/2153 should be dissolved.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicants and Respondent are entitled to joint ownership of the suit property in equal shares.
  3. 3 Whether the Interested Parties should be compelled to facilitate subdivision and registration of the property in joint names.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants and Respondent jointly purchased the suit property and contributed equally to its acquisition. The registration of the property in the Respondent's name as trustee was not intended to create a permanent trust, but was a matter of convenience. There being no opposition from the Respondent and all parties being in agreement, the trust was dissolved. The court ordered that the property be jointly owned by the Applicants and Respondent in equal shares, and directed the Interested Parties to facilitate the necessary consents and registration to effectuate this outcome.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The trust created and bestowed upon Mathew Mohammed Okusimba Omonyo over L.R No. Ndeiya/ Makutano/2153 is dissolved.
  • The property known as Ndeiya/ Makutano/2153 shall be jointly owned by the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th Applicants together with the Respondent, each having an equal share.