[2010] KEHC 2063 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 2063 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land and had only permitted the defendant to reside there temporarily. Upon withdrawal of consent, the defendant's continued occupation became unlawful. The defendant's ownership of a separate parcel and the elders' directive to vacate further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 2063 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: John Arum Obudo; Defendant: Dickson Oowiti Obudo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 77 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim allowed. Defendant to be evicted from the suit land. Plaintiff awarded costs.
Judges
DK Musinga
Legal Topics
Eviction, Ownership Dispute, Land Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Ownership Dispute Land Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Arum Obudo

Plaintiff

Dickson Oowiti Obudo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is unlawfully occupying the plaintiff's registered land parcel.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an eviction order against the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land and had only permitted the defendant to reside there temporarily. Upon withdrawal of consent, the defendant's continued occupation became unlawful. The defendant's ownership of a separate parcel and the elders' directive to vacate further supported the plaintiff's claim. The defendant's defence and counterclaim having been struck out, there was no valid challenge to the plaintiff's title. The court held that the plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to an eviction order against the defendant.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim allowed. Defendant to be evicted from the suit land. Plaintiff awarded costs.

Orders

  • The defendant shall be evicted from land parcel West Kasipul/Konuonga/154 forthwith.
  • The plaintiff shall have the costs of the suit.