[2019] KEELRC 1762 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1762 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to keep and produce statutory employment records, as required by the Employment Act, leaving the court to rely on the claimant's evidence. The court determined that the claimant was not underpaid, as his wages exceeded the statutory minimum. However, the respondent failed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1762 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: John Ashirunga Mjengo; Respondent: Roy Collins Kamau t/a Neema Bakery
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 386 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant in part.
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Wage Disputes, Leave Entitlements, Notice Pay, Public Holidays, Compensation
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Wage Disputes Leave Entitlements Notice Pay Public Holidays Compensation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Ashirunga Mjengo

Claimant

Roy Collins Kamau t/a Neema Bakery

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment contrary to the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to the claimed dues including underpayments, leave pay, notice pay, overtime, gratuity, public holidays, withheld money, and compensation.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent complied with statutory obligations regarding record keeping and due process in termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to keep and produce statutory employment records, as required by the Employment Act, leaving the court to rely on the claimant's evidence. The court determined that the claimant was not underpaid, as his wages exceeded the statutory minimum. However, the respondent failed to follow due process in terminating the claimant, as there was no evidence of a fair hearing or notice. The court held that the claimant was entitled to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, accrued leave, pay for days worked, public holidays, and wage arrears, less the amount already paid by the respondent. Claims for overtime and gratuity were dismissed for lack of...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant in part.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay the claimant Ksh.12,000 as compensation for unfair termination.
  • Respondent to pay Ksh.12,000 as notice pay.