[2009] KEHC 3802 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 3802 (KLR)

The court found that there are several substantive issues between the parties that require determination at a full hearing. Granting the eviction order at this interlocutory stage would be premature and contrary to the principle that suits should be determined comprehensively rather than in installments. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 3802 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: John Bundi Magiri; Defendant: Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd.; Defendant: Isabel Waruguru Mwangi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 443 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Eviction
Outcome
Application dismissed as premature.
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Injunctions, Possession of Property, Mesne Profits
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Orders Injunctions Possession of Property Mesne Profits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Bundi Magiri

Plaintiff

Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd.

Defendant

Isabel Waruguru Mwangi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Eviction

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd defendant is entitled to an order of eviction against the plaintiff pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.
  2. 2 Whether the application for eviction is premature given the existence of unresolved issues between the parties.
  3. 3 Whether the suit should proceed to full hearing rather than being determined in parts.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there are several substantive issues between the parties that require determination at a full hearing. Granting the eviction order at this interlocutory stage would be premature and contrary to the principle that suits should be determined comprehensively rather than in installments. The application for eviction was therefore dismissed to allow the matter to proceed to full hearing, where all issues can be resolved together.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as premature.

Orders

  • The application for eviction is dismissed.
  • The parties are to set the suit down for hearing as soon as possible.