[2017] KEELRC 876 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent and that his termination was not based on any valid reason. The respondent failed to attend court or file any response, and the evidence presented by the claimant was unchallenged. The court held that the termination did not meet the minimum standards...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 876 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: John Busula Libasia; Respondent: J.C.B Ventures Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 431 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed. Judgment entered for the claimant as prayed.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Casual Employment, Terminal Dues, Service Pay, Notice Pay
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Busula Libasia
Claimant
J.C.B Ventures Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly and unlawfully terminated from employment.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to terminal dues and compensation as claimed.
- 3 Whether the respondent complied with the minimum standards of fairness under the Employment Act 2007.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent and that his termination was not based on any valid reason. The respondent failed to attend court or file any response, and the evidence presented by the claimant was unchallenged. The court held that the termination did not meet the minimum standards of fairness required under Sections 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act 2007. The claimant was denied terminal dues and was not given a fair hearing or valid reason for dismissal. Consequently, the court declared the termination unfair and awarded the claimant the terminal benefits and compensation as claimed.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed. Judgment entered for the claimant as prayed.
Orders
- It is declared termination was unfair.
- The respondent shall pay to the claimant terminal benefits and compensation totaling Kshs. 158,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR
RELATIONS COURT AT MOMBASA
CAUSE NUMBER 431 OF 2015
BETWEEN
JOHN BUSULA LIBASIA… …………………………………………………………………….. CLAIMANT
VERSUS
J.C.B VENTURES LTD…………………….…………………………………………………. RESPONDENT
Rika J
Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe
Kitonga O. Kiiva Advocate for the Claimant
No appearance for the Respondent
_____________________________
JUDGMENT
1. The Claimant filed his Statement of Claim on 1st July 2015. He states he was employed as a Casual Labourer by the Respondent, in February 2010. He earned Kshs. 300 per day, the equivalent of Kshs. 9,000 monthly. He reported to work as usual, on 9th April 2013. The Respondent told him he was no longer needed. He was told he did not have skills. All skilled Employees were offered fresh contracts. He was not paid his terminal dues. He feels termination was unfair and unlawful, and prays for Judgment against the Respondent for:-
a) 1 month salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 9,000.
b) Service pay at 15 days’ salary for every complete year of service, at Kshs. 13,500.
c) Annual leave for 3 years worked at Kshs. 27,500.
d) Certificate of Service to issue.
e) 12 months’ salary in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 108,000.
In total, the monetary Claim stands at Kshs. 158,000. The Claimant also prays for declaration that termination was unfair, costs and interest.
2. There is an Affidavit of Service filed by Court Process Server, Timothy Kiringi Kitsao, showing the Respondent was served with Summons and Statement of Claim. The Respondent filed nothing in response, and failed to attend Court on Mention. The Claimant was heard by way of formal proof, on 27th July 2017.
The Court Finds:-
3. The Claim is unopposed.
4. The Court is satisfied the Claimant was employed by the Respondent, on terms and conditions of service stated in his Pleadings, Witness Statement, and Evidence before Court. He was unfairly dismissed by the Respondent. There was no valid reason shown for the decision. He was denied terminal dues. Termination did not conform with the minimum standards of fairness under Section 41, 43 and 45 of the Employment Act 2007.
IT IS ORDERED:-
a) It is declared termination was unfair.
b) The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant terminal benefits and compensation as particularized under paragraph 12 of the Statement of Claim, totaled Kshs. 158,000.
c) Certificate of Service to issue.
d) Costs to the Claimant.
e) Interest granted at 14% per annum from the date of termination till payment in full.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 28th day of July 2017.
James Rika
Judge