[2019] KEHC 7451 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial magistrate failed to harmonise the bond terms for the accused persons after consolidation of the cases, resulting in unjustified disparity. There was no legal or factual basis for imposing higher bond terms on the applicants compared to their co-accused, as all were jointly...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 7451 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Gabriel Mule; Applicant: Peter Nzesya Maithya; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 6 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Bail/bond Terms
- Outcome
- application for revision allowed; bond terms harmonised
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond Terms, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Revision of Subordinate Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Gabriel Mule
Applicant
Peter Nzesya Maithya
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Bail/bond Terms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bond terms imposed on the accused persons in the consolidated criminal case were justified and fair.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate erred by failing to harmonise bond terms for jointly charged accused persons.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the trial magistrate failed to harmonise the bond terms for the accused persons after consolidation of the cases, resulting in unjustified disparity. There was no legal or factual basis for imposing higher bond terms on the applicants compared to their co-accused, as all were jointly charged in the same case. The court exercised its supervisory and revisionary jurisdiction to set aside the disparate bond terms and ordered that all accused persons be released on equal bond terms as initially granted in the original criminal case. This ensured fairness, equality before the law, and prevented preferential treatment among co-accused.
Court Disposition
application for revision allowed; bond terms harmonised
Orders
- The bond terms in respect of accused 1 and accused 3 are set aside.
- Each accused shall be released on a bond of Kshs.200,000 with a surety or a cash bail of Kshs.100,000 as initially granted in Makueni SPM’s criminal case No.190/2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MAKUENI
HC.CR. REV.NO. 6 OF 2019
JOHN GABRIEL MULE.................................1ST APPLICANT
PETER NZESYA MAITHYA..........................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ...........................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Applicants have moved this court by way of a letter dated 03/05/2019 by Manthi Masika & Co Advocates for purposes of revision under Article 165(3) (6) and (7) of the Constitution and Section 362 & 363 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Applicants would want this court to examine Makueni SPM’s Cr. case No. 193 / 2019 and 190/2019, in respect to bail/bond terms.
2. In exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction bestowed upon this court over subordinate courts, I have indeed called for the two files and examined them. One Lazarus Kahingi Munguti was charged vice Cr. Case No. 190/2019 on 16/04/2019 when plea was taken. He was charged with the offence of abuse of office and was released on a bond of Kshs.200,000/= with a surety or cash bail of Kshs.100,000/=.
3. The next day (17/04/2019) vide Cr. Case No.193/2019 John Gabriel Mule was charged with making a document without authority and abuse of office. A 3rd count was in respect of John Gabriel Mule and Peter Nzesya Maithya who were charged with conspiracy to defraud. The accused in Cr.193/2019 were each given a bond of Kshs.800,000/= with a surety or cash bail of Kshs.500,000/=.
4. These two matters are related and to confirm that on 6th May, 2019 the two cases were consolidated with Cr. No. 193/2019 being withdrawn. A new charge sheet was presented to court with all the three accused persons being jointly charged in criminal case no.190/2019 with various offences.
5. After taking the plea for the three accused persons the court made the following order. “The bond terms given earlier remain”. This is the order that is contested by the Applicants. A close scrutiny of the proceedings shows that Lazarus Kahingi who was the initial accused in Cr.No.190/2019 and is the 2nd accused in the consolidated charge sheet is facing two counts and yet his bond terms are the more friendly ones.
6. John Gabriel Mule who is the 1st accused in the consolidated charge sheet faces three (3) counts while Peter Nzesya Munguti the 3rd accused faces only one count. Both the 1st and 3rd accused have been each released on the cash bail of Kshs.500,000/= or a bond of Kshs.800,000/= and a surety.
7. On the face of the record there is no justification for the varied bond terms yet the accused are jointly charged. It was the duty of the learned trial magistrate to harmonise the bond terms after taking plea in the consolidated charge sheet. This would avoid a scenario where one accused person appears to enjoy preferential treatment over the others, as is the case here.
8. I therefore review the bond terms in respect of accused 1 and accused 3 and set them aside. Each accused shall be released on the bond terms initially granted in Makueni SPM’s cr. case No.190/2019. For avoidance of doubt, each accused shall be released on a bond of Kshs.200,000/= with a surety or a cash bail of Kshs.100,000/=.
Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2019 IN OPEN COURT AT MAKUENI.
H. I ONG’UDI
JUDGE