[2019] KEELRC 1223 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1223 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant filed the application for stay of execution without unreasonable delay, thus satisfying one limb of Order 42 Rule 6(2). However, the applicant failed to demonstrate that it would suffer substantial loss if stay was not granted and did not offer any security for the due performance...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1223 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: John Kamwere Mwangi; Applicant: Registered Trustees of Nairobi Gymkhana Sports Club
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 349 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution allowed on condition; partial payment and security ordered.
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Decree, Unlawful Termination, Appeal Process
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Decree Unlawful Termination Appeal Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kamwere Mwangi

Respondent

Registered Trustees of Nairobi Gymkhana Sports Club

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 2nd April, 2019 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has satisfied the requirements for grant of stay under Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.
  3. 3 Whether security for due performance of the decree should be ordered as a condition for stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant filed the application for stay of execution without unreasonable delay, thus satisfying one limb of Order 42 Rule 6(2). However, the applicant failed to demonstrate that it would suffer substantial loss if stay was not granted and did not offer any security for the due performance of the decree. Despite these shortcomings, the court noted that a notice of appeal had been filed and, to avoid rendering the appeal nugatory, granted a conditional stay. The stay was allowed on the condition that the applicant deposits half of the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account in the names of the advocates on record, and the other half be released to the...

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution allowed on condition; partial payment and security ordered.

Orders

  • Stay of execution granted on condition that the applicant deposits half the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account in the joint names of the advocates on record within 30 days.
  • The other half of the decretal sum to be released directly to the claimant within 30 days.