[2010] KEHC 297 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 297 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the initial delay, as the proceedings were not supplied until 3/6/2010 despite timely request and payment. The subsequent three-week delay in filing the application was not considered inordinate by the court. The court also noted that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 297 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Kaniu; Respondent: Jason Bundi Gitari
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 78 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
J Karanja
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Certificate of Delay
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Certificate of Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kaniu

Applicant

Jason Bundi Gitari

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay of three weeks after receipt of the certificate of delay is inordinate.
  3. 3 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the initial delay, as the proceedings were not supplied until 3/6/2010 despite timely request and payment. The subsequent three-week delay in filing the application was not considered inordinate by the court. The court also noted that the intended appeal was not frivolous, as the lower court's ruling was sketchy and lacked sufficient reasoning. Balancing these factors, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time, finding the application merited.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave to file appeal out of time is granted.
  • The appeal shall be filed within 15 days from the date of this ruling.