[2017] KEELRC 538 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 538 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was entitled to underpayment and house allowance as per the Regulation of Wages (General) Amendment Order, 2015, for the period after its commencement. The claimant was also entitled to annual leave pay and payment for off days not taken, as provided by the Employment Act, 2007. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 538 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: John Karago Ndirangu; Respondent: Cobra Security Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 182 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Underpayment of Wages, Annual Leave Entitlement, House Allowance, Certificate of Service, Statutory Minimum Protections
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Underpayment of Wages Annual Leave Entitlement House Allowance Certificate of Service Statutory Minimum Protections

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Karago Ndirangu

Claimant

Cobra Security Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was underpaid in violation of the Regulation of Wages (General) Amendment Order, 2015.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to annual leave pay for the period worked.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to house allowance for the period of employment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was entitled to underpayment and house allowance as per the Regulation of Wages (General) Amendment Order, 2015, for the period after its commencement. The claimant was also entitled to annual leave pay and payment for off days not taken, as provided by the Employment Act, 2007. The discharge signed by the claimant did not preclude statutory claims, as employers cannot contract out of minimum statutory protections. The court relied on precedent to reinforce that statutory rights cannot be waived by a discharge. Judgment was entered for the claimant for the proven sums, certificate of service, and costs.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs.44,994.75 by 15.12.2017, failing which interest at court rates to run from the date of resignation until full payment.
  • The respondent to deliver the certificate of service by 15.12.2017.