[2009] KEHC 4033 (KLR)
The court found that the appeal was filed out of time as it related to orders and judgments delivered in 1993 and 1994, while the memorandum of appeal was filed in August 2004. The appellant had not obtained leave to file the appeal out of time, and although he had filed an application seeking such leave, it had not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 4033 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: John Kariuki Maina; Respondent: Wilfred M. Kamita
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 626 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling
- Outcome
- Directions issued; appellant granted leave to amend and seek extension.
- Judges
- GG Okwengu
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Out of Time, Memorandum of Appeal Defects, Leave of Court, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kariuki Maina
Appellant
Wilfred M. Kamita
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal is fatally defective for failure to comply with Order XLI Rules 1(1) & (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- 2 Whether the appeal was filed out of time without leave of the court.
- 3 Whether the memorandum of appeal is sufficiently clear and compliant with procedural requirements.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appeal was filed out of time as it related to orders and judgments delivered in 1993 and 1994, while the memorandum of appeal was filed in August 2004. The appellant had not obtained leave to file the appeal out of time, and although he had filed an application seeking such leave, it had not been heard. The memorandum of appeal was also found to be defective for lack of clarity regarding the orders appealed against. However, considering that the appellant was acting in person, the court exercised discretion to allow him an opportunity to regularize the appeal by filing an appropriate amended memorandum of appeal and obtaining the necessary leave within 21 days.
Court Disposition
Directions issued; appellant granted leave to amend and seek extension.
Orders
- The appellant shall file an appropriate amended memorandum of appeal within 21 days from the date of the ruling.
- The appellant shall obtain appropriate leave to appeal out of time within the same period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Civil Appeal 626 of 2004
JOHN KARIUKI MAINA….………….…………..APPELLANT
VERSUS
WILFRED M. KAMITA…...……….…………..RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. This appeal came up before me for directions under Order XLI Rule 8B of the Civil Procedure Rules when Wilfred Muriuki Kamita who is the respondent to this appeal rasied a preliminary objection to the hearing of this appeal contending that the appeal is fatally defective as the appellant has not complied with the mandatory provisions of Order XLI Rules 1(1) & (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and further that the appeal has been filed out of time.
2. Counsel for the respondent has submitted that the memorandum of appeal is narrative and contains evidence and that the prayers sought are not clear and it is therefore difficult for the respondent to respond to the appeal. It is further contended that the appeal is defective having been filed out of time without leave of the court.
3. The appellant on his part maintains that he filed his appeal on 23. 08. 04 and that the same was admitted to hearing and that the grounds raised in the memorandum of appeal are nothing but the truth.
4. I have considered the preliminary objection and the submissions made. The memorandum of appeal filed on 23rd August 2004 states as follows:
“Applicant: I am being aggrieved by the way the learned Chairman of Nairobi Rent Restriction Tribunal Court handled the Rent Restriction Tribunal Case No.525/93 when it came up for hearing before him due to the following reasons or errors:”
5. It is not clear from the memorandum of appeal as to what order or ruling of the Rent Tribunal that the appellant is aggrieve of or when such order was made.
6. On the cover of the Record of Appeal the appellant has stated as follows: -
“this is an appeal of the order which was made and delivered on 30th July, 1993 by the Chairman of the Rent Restriction Tribunal Court at Nairobi in respect of the Rent Restriction Tribunal Court at Nairobi, Civil Case No.525/93 and the judgment and order that he made and delivered on 16th March 1994 and another judgment that he made and delivered on 13th June, 1994 in respect of the said Rent Restriction Tribunal Court, Civil Case No.525/93. ”
7. That means that the appeal is against 3 orders/judgment made on different dates i.e. 30th July, 1993, 16th March, 1994, and 13th June, 1994. The Memorandum of Appeal having been filed on 23rd August 2004, it is evident that the appeal was filed out of time as it relates to all the 3 orders.
8. The appellant has not obtained leave to file his appeal out of time. I do note that the appellant had filed a chamber summons dated 15th August, 2005 on 21st December, 2005 in which he sought inter alia to be allowed to continue his appeal out of time. However, that application has apparently not been heard to date.
9. This means that the appeal before the court is not ready for hearing. Indeed, the memorandum of appeal is defective. However, appreciation that the appellant is acting in person, I will give him an opportunity to redeem himself by giving directions that an appropriate amended memorandum, of appeal shall be filed within 21 days from today and that appropriate leave shall also be obtained within the same period.
Those shall be the orders of this court.
Dated and delivered this 29th day of January, 2009
H. M. OKWENGU
JUDGE
In the presence of: -
The appellant present in person
Miss Githinji for the respondent