[2021] KEHC 4218 (KLR)
The court determined that since the orders sought to be reviewed were issued by Lady Justice Thuranira, and she is still serving in the Civil Division, it is prudent and fair that the application for review be heard and determined by her. The court therefore directed that the file be placed before Lady Justice...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 4218 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Kimani Chege; Respondent: William Gatei Muiruri
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application Application382 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Directions
- Outcome
- Application referred to original judge for directions.
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Review of Orders, Stay of Execution, Setting Aside Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kimani Chege
Applicant
William Gatei Muiruri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should review and set aside the orders issued on 4th July 2018.
- 2 Whether the application for stay of execution pending review is merited.
- 3 Whether the matter should be heard by the judge who issued the original orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that since the orders sought to be reviewed were issued by Lady Justice Thuranira, and she is still serving in the Civil Division, it is prudent and fair that the application for review be heard and determined by her. The court therefore directed that the file be placed before Lady Justice Thuranira for mention and further directions, rather than making a determination on the merits of the application at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application referred to original judge for directions.
Orders
- The file to be placed before Lady Justice Thuranira on 16th September 2021 for mention and further orders on the motion dated 30th January 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CIVIL MISC. APPL. NO. 382 OF 2016
JOHN KIMANI CHEGE....................APPLICANT
VERSUS
WILLIAM GATEI MUIRURI.......RESPONDENT
RULING ON DIRECTIONS
1. John Kimani Chege, the applicant herein took out the motiondated 30th January 2019 whereof he sought for the following orders:
a. THAT this application be certified as urgent and be heard exparte in the first instance for urgency of the same.
b. THAT this honourable court be pleased to order stay of execution of the order granted on 4th July 2018 and all consequent orders pending hearing and determination of this application.
c. THAT this honourable court be pleased to review, set aside on vary the order issued on 4th July, 2018.
d. THAT this honourable court be pleased to give any other or additional orders as it may deem fit and in order to meet the ends of justice.
e. THAT the costs of this application be provided for.
2. The applicant filed the affidavit he swore in support of the motion.William Gatei Muiruri, the respondent herein, filed a replying affidavit he swore and a notice of preliminary objection to oppose the motion.
3. This court gave directions to have the motion disposed bywritten submissions. However, at the time of writing this ruling none of the parties had filed their written submissions therefore this court proceeded to consider the material placed before it to determine the motion.
4. I have considered the grounds stated on the face of the motionplus the facts deponed in the affidavits filed in support and against the motion. I have further considered the notice of preliminary objection.
5. The main prayer the applicant has sought is an order for reviewwith a view of setting aside the order issued on 4th July 2018. The record shows that on 4th July 2018, Lady Justice Thuranira issued the following orders inter alia;
i. That the exparte orders of Lady Justice B. Thuranira Jaden made herein on 19th September 2016 be and is hereby set aside.
ii. That the application dated 26th July 2016 and filed on the same day be and is hereby struck out.
6. Those are the orders the applicant now seeks to be reviewed andset aside vide the instant motion.
7. When the motion came up for interpartes hearing learnedcounsels appearing in this matter did not point out that the orders sought to be reviewed were issued by Lady Justice Thuranira. The Honourable Judge is still serving in Civil Division. It is only prudent and fair to have the application heard and determined by the Hon. Lady Justice Thuranira. Consequently, this file should be placed before Lady Justice Thuranira on 16th September 2021 for mention for further orders and directions on the motion dated 30th January 2019.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
…….….…………….
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE
In the presence of:
…………………………………. for the Applicant
…………………………………. for the Respondent