[2022] KEELC 1719 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1719 (KLR)

The court found that the present suit and the earlier suit before the Senior Principal Magistrates Court at Kapsabet involved the same parties and the same subject matter, specifically the parcel of land Nandi/Ndulele/985, and sought similar reliefs. The court held that the present suit was therefore sub judice...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1719 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: John Kiprotich Saina; Defendant: Barnaba Kipkemboi Saina
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kapsabet
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 107 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Strike Out or Stay Suit
Outcome
suit dismissed as sub judice and abuse of court process
Legal Topics
Subjudice, Abuse of Court Process, Parallel Proceedings, Rectification of Title
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Subjudice Abuse of Court Process Parallel Proceedings Rectification of Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kiprotich Saina

Plaintiff

Barnaba Kipkemboi Saina

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Strike Out or Stay Suit

  1. 1 Whether the suit is sub judice in light of a pending suit between the same parties over the same subject matter in another court.
  2. 2 Whether the present suit constitutes an abuse of the court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the present suit and the earlier suit before the Senior Principal Magistrates Court at Kapsabet involved the same parties and the same subject matter, specifically the parcel of land Nandi/Ndulele/985, and sought similar reliefs. The court held that the present suit was therefore sub judice under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act. Furthermore, the court found that the plaintiff/respondent's averment that there was no pending proceeding was false, amounting to forum shopping and an abuse of the court process. The court concluded that the suit was both sub judice and an abuse of the court process, and accordingly dismissed the suit with costs to the defendant/applicant.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed as sub judice and abuse of court process

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant/applicant.
  • The application dated 15.2.2021 is granted.