[2018] KEHC 5743 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5743 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, having been convicted of causing grievous harm, was sentenced to four years' imprisonment, which is significantly below the maximum penalty of life imprisonment prescribed by law. The court considered the applicant's prior conviction and problematic conduct in the community, as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 5743 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Kipruto Tum; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 3 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
Outcome
application for review of sentence dismissed
Judges
EM Ngugi
Legal Topics
Attempted Murder, Sentence Review, Grievous Harm, Penal Code Interpretation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Attempted Murder Sentence Review Grievous Harm Penal Code Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kipruto Tum

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's sentence for causing grievous harm should be reviewed.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was appropriate given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, having been convicted of causing grievous harm, was sentenced to four years' imprisonment, which is significantly below the maximum penalty of life imprisonment prescribed by law. The court considered the applicant's prior conviction and problematic conduct in the community, as indicated in the social inquiry report. The judge concluded that the sentence imposed by the trial court was not excessive or unjust and, in fact, was lenient given the gravity of the offence. Therefore, there was no justification to review or reduce the sentence, and the application for review was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application for review of sentence dismissed

Orders

  • The application for review of sentence is dismissed.