[2013] KEHC 2292 (KLR)
The court found that, upon perusal of the lower court's proceedings and judgment, the appeal did not have an overwhelming chance of success. Additionally, the court noted that the applicant would not have served a substantial part of his 25-year sentence by the time the appeal was determined. Therefore, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 2292 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Kivuitu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 82 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Pending Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Defilement Offence, Sentencing, Appellate Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kivuitu
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Pending Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal has an overwhelming chance of success warranting release on bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, upon perusal of the lower court's proceedings and judgment, the appeal did not have an overwhelming chance of success. Additionally, the court noted that the applicant would not have served a substantial part of his 25-year sentence by the time the appeal was determined. Therefore, the application for bail pending appeal did not meet the threshold established in precedent, and the applicant was not entitled to bail.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 82 OF 2013
JOHN KIVUITU………………………………………….....APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ………………………………………………..RESPONDENT
RULING
John Kivuitu; the Applicant herein seeks to be released on bail pending appeal. He has filed an appeal- H.C. Criminal Appeal No. 188/2012 having been dissatisfied by the decision of the trial magistrate in Machakos Sexual Offence Case No. 1/2009.
The Applicant is supported by an affidavit deponed by the applicant who states that he was convicted and sentenced to serve 25 years imprisonment for an offence of defilement. His case has a chance of succeeding which calls for his release on bail.
Opposing the application, Mr. Mwangi, Learned State Counsel stated that the lower court evaluated the evidence adduced and found that indeed the appellant had defiled the complainant having even claimed that she was his wife. Medical evidence presented had proved the act of penetration. The appeal therefore could not succeed.
Further, he stated that having been sentenced to 25 years imprisonment, by the time the appeal is heard and determined he will not have served a substantial part of the sentence.
Bail is a channel that is used to secure one’s liberty. To secure one’s freedom pending appeal, some factors must be considered. For example; the strength of evidence on record. Will it be so weak such that the appeal has a chance of succeeding? The most important issue to be considered by the court is if the appeal has an overwhelming chance of success(see Dominic Karanja versus Republic [1986] KLR 612).In the circumstances the court would have no excuse of denying the appellant/applicant his freedom.
Having perused the proceedings and judgment of the Lower Court, I am not persuaded that the appeal has an overwhelming chance of succeeding. Secondly, by the time the appeal is concluded the applicant will not have served a substantial part of the sentence imposed.
In view of the foregoing, the application must fail. In the premises it is dismissed.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVEREDat MACHAKOS this 4THday of SEPTEMBER, 2013.
L.N. MUTENDE
JUDGE