[2019] KEHC 4402 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 4402 (KLR)

The court found that the SCCIO, Tigania Central, provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in complying with the court order issued on 13/09/2019. The delay was occasioned by the officer's need to verify the order with the court, after which he was advised by the Deputy Registrar on the proper procedure for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 4402 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Kobia Ikiao; Applicant: Joseph Gikuula M’ Kirigia; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 171 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Compliance With Court Order
Outcome
Explanation for delay accepted; officer discharged; directed to comply with order.
Judges
A Mabeya
Legal Topics
Compliance With Court Orders, Criminal Procedure, Enforcement of Orders
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Compliance With Court Orders Criminal Procedure Enforcement of Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kobia Ikiao

Applicant

Joseph Gikuula M’ Kirigia

Applicant

Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Compliance With Court Order

  1. 1 Whether the SCCIO, Tigania Central, was in contempt of court for delayed compliance with the court order issued on 13/09/2019.
  2. 2 Whether the explanation provided for the delay in compliance was satisfactory.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the SCCIO, Tigania Central, provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in complying with the court order issued on 13/09/2019. The delay was occasioned by the officer's need to verify the order with the court, after which he was advised by the Deputy Registrar on the proper procedure for execution. The court accepted the explanation, discharged the officer from any contempt proceedings, and directed him to proceed with compliance. The officer was warned to comply promptly with court orders in the future.

Court Disposition

Explanation for delay accepted; officer discharged; directed to comply with order.

Orders

  • Mr. Stephen Murega is discharged from contempt proceedings.
  • The officer is directed to proceed and comply with the court order.