[2011] KEHC 2123 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant, although served with summons, failed to take timely steps to defend the suit or arrest the judgment. Her claim that she instructed advocates was unsupported by any affidavit from the said advocates. The draft defence and counterclaim did not raise triable issues, as the defendant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 2123 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Kuria Gikuiyu; Defendant: Grace Wangui Kamiti
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 594 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Chamber Summons / Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- A Mbogholi-Msagha
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Judgment, Service of Summons, Locus Standi, Registered Land, Trespass, Formal Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kuria Gikuiyu
Plaintiff
Grace Wangui Kamiti
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chamber Summons / Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ex parte judgment entered against the defendant should be set aside.
- 2 Whether the defendant has demonstrated triable issues to warrant leave to defend the suit.
- 3 Whether the defendant has legal capacity to claim the suit property on behalf of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant, although served with summons, failed to take timely steps to defend the suit or arrest the judgment. Her claim that she instructed advocates was unsupported by any affidavit from the said advocates. The draft defence and counterclaim did not raise triable issues, as the defendant had not demonstrated legal capacity to claim the property on behalf of the deceased, lacking proof of being the legal representative. The court emphasized that litigants must bear the consequences of their advocates' omissions unless exceptional circumstances are shown. Accordingly, the application to set aside the ex parte judgment was dismissed as no sufficient cause or...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application to set aside the judgment is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
ELC NO. 594 OF 2009
JOHN KURIA GIKUIYU................................................................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
GRACE WANGUI KAMITI.......................................................................................DEFENDANT
RULING
The plaintiff brought this suit against the defendant in respect of a parcel of land known as LR No. Limuru/Bibirioni/T. 622 which he claimed to be the registered owner thereof.The defendant is said to be living in a house within the said parcel of land as a licensee of the plaintiff’s predecessor in title. He claimed orders that the defendant do vacate the said premises and damages for trespass.
The record shows that the defendant was served with summons to enter appearance but did not comply. The plaintiff proceeded to ask for judgment which was granted and the matter listed for formal proof. The case was heard by Muchelule J who on 28th June, 2010 entered judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant and ordered that she vacates the land within 60 days failing which she would be forcefully removed. The plaintiff subsequently obtained a stay order which has remained in place to date.
There is now before me an application by way of Chamber Summons Under Order IXA Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act seeking to set aside the judgment entered herein and that the defendant be given unconditional leave to defend the suit. The basic ground is that the defendant a the defence that raises triable issues. The application is opposed and there is a replying affidavit sworn by the plaintiff/respondent. Both learned counsel have also filed written submissions that I have noted.
The defendant applicant has admitted that she was served with summons to enter appearance. She then handed over the documents to advocates known as Nganga Njau advocates who however failed to act as instructed. It is instructive to note that the said advocates have not sworn an affidavit to support the plaintiff’s allegations. This would mean that the advocates have not been asked and have not owned up to their mistake or ommission as alleged by the defendant/applicant.
I have also looked at the supporting affidavit of the plaintiff sworn on 15th December, 2010. The defendant/applicant says that she perused the court file and discovered that there was an interlocutory judgment entered and that the matter was scheduled for judgment on 28th June, 2010. She did not however take any steps to arrest the said judgment. In the draft defence and counter claim and in particular prayer (b) thereof the defendant/applicant says that the court should issue a declaration that the suit property belongs to the deceased and I believe in this case she means her late husband. However, if that property belongs to the deceased, she has not justified her legal capacity to plead that the property be declared as such. That is to say she has not shown she is the legal representative of her late husband’s estate. Lack of capacity per se disentitles her the locus to move the court relating to the suit property.
If it is true that she instructed counsel to take up her defence which has not been done, her remedy lies against those advocates. The time has come when litigants must squarely blame their advocates for any acts of omission or negligence.In this case however as I have already observed the said advocates have not owned up in that regard. I have also looked at the judgment of Muchelule, J and in particular the learned judge’s observations in respect of Sections 27 and 28 of the Registered Land Act, Cap 300 Laws of Kenya. With respect, even after looking at the annexed draft defence and counter claim, I am not persuaded that the defendant/applicant has raised any triable issues to justify the setting aside of the said judgment.
The application is therefore dismissed with costs.
Orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 4th day of May, 2011
A.MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
JUDGE