[2015] KEELRC 1568 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1568 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was not dismissed but absconded from work after being asked to repay a salary advance. The evidence showed that the respondent had remitted all statutory deductions, including NSSF and NHIF, and that the claimant had either taken annual leave or was paid in lieu of leave not taken....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1568 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: John Lubiah Odimwah; Respondent: Northstar Packaging Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 310 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed with costs to the respondent
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Salary in Lieu of Notice, Nssf Remittance, Annual Leave Entitlement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Salary in Lieu of Notice Nssf Remittance Annual Leave Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Lubiah Odimwah

Claimant

Northstar Packaging Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unlawfully dismissed from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to one month salary in lieu of notice.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent failed to remit NSSF deductions for the claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was not dismissed but absconded from work after being asked to repay a salary advance. The evidence showed that the respondent had remitted all statutory deductions, including NSSF and NHIF, and that the claimant had either taken annual leave or was paid in lieu of leave not taken. The claimant failed to prove any of his claims on a balance of probabilities. Consequently, the court dismissed the entire suit with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The entire suit is dismissed with costs to the respondent.