[2002] KEHC 237 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 237 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had satisfied the requirements for the grant of vesting orders by presenting a valid certificate of sale and supporting affidavit. The original file from the subordinate court, including the orders delivered on 15th April 2002, confirmed the applicant's entitlement. There was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KEHC 237 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Elliston Mwangeka Ndau; Plaintiff: John Macharia Muhuni; Defendant: Austin Own Mwanguti; Defendant: Lions Export and Import Agency Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 493 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Vesting Orders
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Vesting Orders, Execution of Judgment, Transfer of Land Title
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Vesting Orders Execution of Judgment Transfer of Land Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elliston Mwangeka Ndau

Applicant

John Macharia Muhuni

Plaintiff

Austin Own Mwanguti

Defendant

Lions Export and Import Agency Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Vesting Orders

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to vesting orders for the property known as L.R. No. 1956/502/Voi in execution of a certificate of sale.
  2. 2 Whether the orders of the subordinate court dated 15th April 2002 justify the granting of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had satisfied the requirements for the grant of vesting orders by presenting a valid certificate of sale and supporting affidavit. The original file from the subordinate court, including the orders delivered on 15th April 2002, confirmed the applicant's entitlement. There was no opposition or evidence to the contrary. Accordingly, the application was merited and granted in terms of prayers 1 and 2 of the Notice of Motion.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Application allowed in terms of prayers 1 and 2 of the Notice of Motion.
  • No order as to costs.