[2001] KECA 60 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 60 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time, deeming the applicant's appeal as properly filed within the time allowed by the court's rules. The decision was based on the understanding that the applicant's appeal was ready for hearing and no prejudice would be occasioned to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 60 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Maina Kahehu; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 22 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Criminal Appeals, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Extension of Time Criminal Appeals Procedural Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Maina Kahehu

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file an appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time, deeming the applicant's appeal as properly filed within the time allowed by the court's rules. The decision was based on the understanding that the applicant's appeal was ready for hearing and no prejudice would be occasioned to the respondent.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant's appeal is deemed as having been filed within the time allowed by the court's Rules.