[2017] KEELRC 901 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 901 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to follow due process as required by section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007, as the claimant was not given notice or a hearing prior to termination. The evidence established that the claimant was locked out, amounting to constructive termination. Although there were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 901 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: John Maina Wahome; Respondent: Vegpro (K) Ltd-Kitawi Farm
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 146 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant.
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Constructive Dismissal, Notice Pay, Certificate of Service, Costs of Suit
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Constructive Dismissal Notice Pay Certificate of Service Costs of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Maina Wahome

Claimant

Vegpro (K) Ltd-Kitawi Farm

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment.
  2. 2 Whether due process under section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007 was followed in the termination.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, and other reliefs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to follow due process as required by section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007, as the claimant was not given notice or a hearing prior to termination. The evidence established that the claimant was locked out, amounting to constructive termination. Although there were warnings on record, the lack of procedural fairness rendered the termination unfair. The court awarded the claimant three months’ salary as compensation for unfair termination under section 49(1)(c) of the Act, one month’s pay in lieu of notice, and costs of the suit. Claims for salary and house allowance for April 2013 and redundancy pay were dismissed as the claimant had already...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs.42,000 by 01.09.2017, failing which interest to run at court rates.
  • Certificate of service to be delivered by 01.09.2017.