[2011] KEHC 4090 (KLR)
The court held that under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and Orders 42 and 43 of the Civil Procedure Rules, an appeal to the High Court from a subordinate court must be based on a decree or order, and a certified copy of such decree or order must be included in the record of appeal. The absence of this...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 4090 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: John Masese Mogoi; Appellant: Nelson Asiango Mogoi; Respondent: Hellen Nyaboke Ondieki; Respondent: Champion Ayora Kiboto
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 55 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Competency of Appeal, Requirement of Decree or Order, Jurisdiction, Striking Out Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Masese Mogoi
Appellant
Nelson Asiango Mogoi
Appellant
Hellen Nyaboke Ondieki
Respondent
Champion Ayora Kiboto
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal to the High Court is competent in the absence of a certified decree or order from the subordinate court.
- 2 Whether the absence of such a document renders the appeal a nullity or incompetent.
- 3 Whether the court can strike out an incompetent appeal suo moto.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and Orders 42 and 43 of the Civil Procedure Rules, an appeal to the High Court from a subordinate court must be based on a decree or order, and a certified copy of such decree or order must be included in the record of appeal. The absence of this document is a fundamental defect that goes to the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the appeal. Since the record of appeal did not contain the certified order from which the appeal arose, the appeal was incompetent and a nullity. The court, exercising its jurisdiction, struck out the appeal with costs to the respondents, notwithstanding that the issue was not raised by the...
Court Disposition
appeal struck out as incompetent
Orders
- The appeal is struck out as incompetent.
- Costs awarded to the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
No. 349
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISII
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2010
JOHN MASESE MOGOI........................................................................................... 1st APPELLANT
NELSON ASIANGO MOGOI .....................................................................................2nd APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
HELLEN NYABOKE ONDIEKI ................................................................................1st RESPONDENT
CHAMPION AYORA KIBOTO................................................................................2nd RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
(Being an appeal from the Ruling of Hon. G. H Oduor SRM Kisii in Misc. App. No. 141 of 2008 dated on the 4th March, 2010).
This appeal is incompetent. The appeal as indicated in the record of appeal is against “The ruling of Hon. G. H. Oduor SRM Kisii in Misc. Application (sic) No. 141 of 2008 dated on 4th March, 2010”.
Previously appeals to this court were provided for under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and Order XLI of the Civil Procedure Rules. This was when the previous Civil Procedure Act and rules made thereunder held sway. However that Civil Procedure Act and in particular the rules made thereunder have since been replaced by the current Civil Procedure Rules vide legal notice number 151 which came into force on 10th September, 2010. In the current Civil Procedure Rules the appeals are dealt with under orders 42 and 43. Under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act which was not touched by the extensive amendments aforesaid, an appeal from a subordinate court to this court must be from a decree or order of that subordinate court. Similarly Order 42 provide that the appeal must be from a decree or order of the subordinate court. Such certified decree or order pursuant to rule 2 should be filed with the memorandum of appeal failing which the appellant shall file such certified copy as soon as possible and in any event within such time as the court may order. Under order 42 rule 13 when considering directions to give in the appeal, some of the documents that must be in the record of appeal is the judgment, order or decree appealed from. Finally under order 43, an appeal lies of right from the orders made on application for review such as the application which was before the learned magistrate and whose refusal is the subject of this appeal.
Taking into account all the foregoing provisions of the law, it is clear that an appeal can only lie against the decree or order. Such decree or order must be in the record of appeal either at the time of filing the memorandum of appeal or subsequently. In the record of this appeal the certified order from which the appeal arises is not in the record. The absence of such vital document renders the appeal a nullity or incompetent. I am aware that the issue was not raised in the written submissions of the parties. However, this is a matter of law and goes to the jurisdiction. I can address it suo moto. That being my view of the matter, I find the appeal incompetent and is accordingly struck out with costs to the respondents.
Judgment dated, signedanddelivered at Kisii this 31st day of January, 2011.
ASIKE-MAKHANDIA
JUDGE