[2013] KEHC 2798 (KLR)
The application was unopposed, and the court found merit in the applicant's request. The court held that, in the absence of opposition and given the evidence that the respondent was intermeddling with the estate property, it was appropriate to grant the orders sought. The substitution of the respondent as petitioner...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 2798 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Muathe Kituku; Applicant: Peter Muindi Kituku; Respondent: Priscilla Koki Muathe
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 540 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed as prayed. Orders granted as sought by the applicant.
- Judges
- BT Jaden
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Administration of Estates, Intermeddling With Estate Property
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Muathe Kituku
Applicant
Peter Muindi Kituku
Applicant
Priscilla Koki Muathe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent should be substituted as petitioner in place of her deceased husband.
- 2 Whether the respondent should be restrained from intermeddling with the estate property, specifically land parcel No. Kangundo/Kivani/309, until administration is complete.
- 3 Whether the respondent should be restrained from making permanent improvements or altering the landscape of the estate land.
Ratio Decidendi
The application was unopposed, and the court found merit in the applicant's request. The court held that, in the absence of opposition and given the evidence that the respondent was intermeddling with the estate property, it was appropriate to grant the orders sought. The substitution of the respondent as petitioner was necessary for the proper administration of the estate following the death of the original petitioner. Further, injunctive relief was warranted to prevent the respondent from interfering with, damaging, or altering the estate property until the estate was properly administered. The court exercised its discretion under the Law of Succession Act and the Probate and...
Court Disposition
Application allowed as prayed. Orders granted as sought by the applicant.
Orders
- The respondent, Priscilla Koki Muathe, is substituted as petitioner in place of her deceased husband.
- The respondent, by herself, agents, and servants, is restrained from intermeddling with the estate of the deceased by damaging, uprooting crops, planting, and dispossessing the applicant of parcel No. Kangundo/Kivani/309 until the estate is administered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 540 OF 2009
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KITUKU NZOMO WAMBUA (DECEASED)
JOHN MUATHE KITUKU
PETER MUINDI KITUKU ................................. APPLICANTS
VERSUS
MUATHE KITUKU (DECEASED
PRISCILLA KOKI MUATHE ………….… RESPONDENTS
R U L I N G
The application dated 5/3/2012 is brought under section 47 and Succession Act 2 Rule 59 of the Probate and Administration Rules.
The application seeks the following orders:-
“The respondent being the wife ofMuathe Kitukuin this cause be substituted as a petitioner instead of her deceased husband.
The respondent by herself, agents and servants be restrained from intermeddling with the estate of the deceased by damaging, uprooting crops, planting and dispossessing the applicant of parcel No.Kangundo/Kivani/309until the estate is administered.
The respondent to be restrained from making permanent improvement on the land and or changing the landscape.”
The application is supported by the affidavit of the Applicant, Peter Muindi Kituku sworn on 5/3/2012. According to the said affidavit, land parcel No. Kangundo/Katitu/309 forms part of the estate of the deceased. The Applicant accuses the Respondent of taking over the said land with all the improvements thereon and starting to prepare it for the planting season. The Applicant’s contention is that the land was in his possession although wrongly registered in the name of the deceased. The Applicant further stated that he relied on the said land for his food crops.
The Respondent, Priscilla Koki Muathe did not file any papers in opposition to the application nor did she attend on the hearing date though duly served.
I have considered the application. The same is unopposed. I allow orders as prayed.
………………………………………
B. THURANIRA JADEN
JUDGE
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 11thday of July 2013.
………………………………………
B. THURANIRA JADEN
JUDGE