[2005] KEHC 3142 (KLR)
The court held that the trial was a nullity because it was conducted by a police constable, contrary to Section 85(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court further reasoned that a retrial was not appropriate because the evidence against the appellant was weak, the appellant had provided a plausible defence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 3142 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: John Muema Kamola; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 16 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Handling Stolen Property, Criminal Procedure Irregularities, Prosecution by Unauthorized Personnel
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Muema Kamola
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction and sentence were valid given that the prosecution was conducted by a police constable contrary to Section 85(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether a retrial should be ordered in the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the trial was a nullity because it was conducted by a police constable, contrary to Section 85(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court further reasoned that a retrial was not appropriate because the evidence against the appellant was weak, the appellant had provided a plausible defence regarding the purchase of the sheep, and he had already served a substantial part of his sentence. Therefore, it would not be fair or just to subject him to a retrial. The conviction was quashed and the sentence set aside, with the appellant ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
10 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYAIN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Criminal Appeal 16 of 2004(From Original conviction (s) and Sentence (s) in Criminal Case No. 681 of 2003 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kangundo N.N. Njagi SRM 29/10/03)
JOHN MUEMA KAMOLA ………………………………………….. APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………. RESPONDENT
J U D G E M E N T
The appellant was convicted of handling stolen livestock, that is, a sheep. He was sentenced to seven years imprisonment. He appealed against the conviction and sentence. The state rightly conceded the appeal because the prosecution was conducted by a police constable contrary to the provisions of Section 85 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. For this reason, there is no dispute that the trial was a nullity and this appeal should be allowed on that ground alone.
Mr O’Mirera, sought a retrial. I have considered the facts of this case. The one sheep found in possession of the appellant was so found a year after the livestock of complainant were stolen. He gave a defence to the effect that he had bought the sheep from a given person who was called and testified, stating that he had not sold the sheep. In my view, even if the third party denied selling the sheep, the appellant’s defence was not thereby nullified and make impossible. There is no way the alleged seller could accept selling the sheep to appellant because that could make him the thief or handler. It is my view, therefore, that the chances of securing a conviction on a retrial are minimal. In addition the appellant has served a substantial part of his sentence. It may not be fair and just to expose him to a fresh sentence.
Accordingly, the request for a retrial is refused as not in the interest of justice. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The conviction is quashed and the sentence of 7 years imprisonment set aside. The appellant is ordered set at liberty from prison forthwith unless otherwise therein lawfully held. It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 8th day of November 2005.
D.A. ONYANCHA JUDGE