[2020] KEELC 2441 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant was granted a conditional stay of execution after judgment, but failed to comply with the conditions and did not file a notice of appeal. As a result, the stay lapsed and there is no subsisting order preventing execution. The defendant's application for review in a related...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 2441 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Muriungi Mugwika; Defendant: Charity Mpinda M’Mugwika
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 26 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Police Assistance in Eviction
- Outcome
- application allowed with costs to the applicant; temporary stay of 45 days granted
- Legal Topics
- Eviction Orders, Execution of Judgment, Stay of Execution, Succession and Inheritance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Muriungi Mugwika
Plaintiff
Charity Mpinda M’Mugwika
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Police Assistance in Eviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to police assistance to enforce the eviction order against the defendant.
- 2 Whether the defendant's pending application for review in the succession cause affects the execution of the judgment in this matter.
- 3 Whether there is any subsisting stay of execution preventing enforcement of the judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant was granted a conditional stay of execution after judgment, but failed to comply with the conditions and did not file a notice of appeal. As a result, the stay lapsed and there is no subsisting order preventing execution. The defendant's application for review in a related succession cause does not affect the enforceability of the judgment in this case, as the court is now functus officio regarding the substantive claims. The only remaining issue is execution. The court therefore allowed the plaintiff's application for police assistance to enforce the eviction, but granted a temporary stay of 45 days due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Court Disposition
application allowed with costs to the applicant; temporary stay of 45 days granted
Orders
- The O.C.P.D Meru is authorized to provide security to Ms CLEAR REAL AUCTIONEERS to proceed with the eviction of the defendant from land parcel No. Abothuguchi/Ruiga/336.
- A stay of execution of these orders is granted for 45 days due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU
ELC CASE NO. 26 OF 2013
JOHN MURIUNGI MUGWIKA …………...………………………..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
CHARITY MPINDA M’MUGWIKA ……......…DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The plaintiff has filed the application dated 19. 9.2019 (filed on 23. 9.2019) seeking orders that the O.C.P.D Meru be authorized to give security to Ms CLEAR REAL AUCTIONEERS to proceed to evict the defendant from land parcel No. Abothuguchi/Ruiga/336. The grounds in support of the application are set out in the body of the application and in the affidavit of the applicant.
2. The applicant contends that when judgment was delivered on 23. 1.2018, defendant was given a stay of 30 days. Thereafter, defendant filed an application for extension of the stay orders where she was granted 40 more days and she was to serve the notice of appeal within 7 days. Applicant contends that no appeal was ever pursued. The applicant hence desires to hire the auctioneers to levy eviction process hence the need for the security.
3. Defendant has opposed the application vide her replying affidavit filed on 28. 10. 2019. She contends that the judgment of this court delivered on 23. 1.2018 has a nexus with a succession cause no.225 of 2011 where she has made an application for review of a judgment given in the succession cause. The respondent avers that the outcome of her application for review in the succession cause will substantively change the cause of the proceedings in this matter and the said judgment of 23. 1.2018 plus decree will be subjected to a review accordingly. The respondent further claims that the plan to evict her from her inheritance is cruel and inhumane and that the orders sought for are not merited.
4. The parties did not file submissions as directed by the court hence no arguments have been proffered for or in opposition to the application.
5. The court can only determine the application on the basis of the issues raised in the application and the affidavits of the parties.
6. I have considered that judgment herein was delivered on 23. 1.2018. Thereafter, the applicant filed an application for extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal and for a temporary stay of execution. Vide the ruling delivered on 11. 4.2018, the defendant was given a conditional stay of which she appears not to have complied with. There is no notice of appeal. Thus the orders granted to the defendant on 11. 4.2018 have lapsed. There is no further order of stay of execution in so far as the judgment of this court is concerned.
7. The application made by the applicant is meant to give effect to the implementation of this judgment. This court has already pronounced itself in so far as the claims of the litigants are concerned and hence the court is functus officio in so far as those claims are concerned. The court is only left with the issue of execution of the judgment.
8. In the circumstances I find that the application dated 19. 9.2019 is merited and the same is allowed with costs to the applicant.I do however grant a stay of the orders herein for a period of 45 DAYS due to the prevailing health circumstances concerning covid 19 pandemic.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 20TH DAY OF MAY, 2020
HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE
ORDER
The date of delivery of this ruling was given to the parties at the conclusion of the hearing and by a fresh notice by the Deputy Registrar. In light of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to the COVID-19 pandemicand following the practice directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice dated 17th March, 2020 and published in the Kenya Gazette of 17th April 2020 as Gazette Notice no.3137, this ruling has been delivered to the parties by electronic mail. They are deemed to have waived compliance with order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court.
HON. LUCY N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE