[2018] KEHC 2077 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant had already served a total of seven years in custody, including the period prior to sentencing, and that the reasons for delay in the case were not clear. Given the prosecution's concession of special circumstances and the appellant's demonstrated reformation and vocational...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2077 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: John Mwangi Waweru; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Naivasha
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 62 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Appeal Limited to Mitigation
- Outcome
- appeal allowed on mitigation; sentence deemed served
- Judges
- RM Mwongo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Mitigation of Sentence, Custodial Sentence, Pre Trial Custody, Delay in Trial
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Mwangi Waweru
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Appeal Limited to Mitigation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be considered in determining if the appellant has served his sentence.
- 2 Whether special circumstances exist to warrant the appellant's release based on mitigation grounds.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant had already served a total of seven years in custody, including the period prior to sentencing, and that the reasons for delay in the case were not clear. Given the prosecution's concession of special circumstances and the appellant's demonstrated reformation and vocational training, the court held that it was just to deem the sentence as fully served. The court ordered the appellant's immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held, emphasizing that justice would best be served by recognizing the time already spent in custody and the mitigating factors presented.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed on mitigation; sentence deemed served
Orders
- The appellant is deemed to have served his full sentence in the present case.
- The appellant shall be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIVASHA
CORAM: R MWONGO, J
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.62OF 2015
(Being an Appeal from the Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No 3286 of 2012 in the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Naivasha, (E. Kimilu- Ag PM)
JOHN MWANGI WAWERU.................................................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC……………………………….……………….RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
Having considered all issues arising in this case and the clarifications given in respect of the previous charges against the Applicant, and further taking into account that in the present case the Applicant was arrested and has been in custody since 27th October, 2012 till the date of his sentencing to imprisonment for 4 years on 17th April, 2015. I determine as follows:-
1. The Applicant has already served the full sentence in CMCRC No. 5077 of 2012.
2. The Applicant was in custody in the present case since October, 2012.
3. Overall the Applicant has spent7 years in prison and reasons for delay in processing the case and sentencing in the present case are not clear.
4. Given the concession by the prosecution that this case raises special circumstances, it is appropriate that the Applicant be deemed to have served his full sentence in the present case.
5. The Applicant shall be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
6. The determination herein arises from the Applicant’s Petition of Appeal limited to grounds of mitigation only, filed on 26th September, 2018. In the Mitigation Petition the Applicant states that he has served third of the sentence since incarceration. He also pointed out, orally, that he was arrested in 2012 and his case has proceeded very slowly, hence he has been prejudiced.
He added that he has reformed whilst in prison and received vocational training; and that he can be a resourceful person in society if given the opportunity. These matters commend themselves to me and I have duly taken them into account as they persuade me that the Applicant’s release will best serve justice in this case.
Dated and Delivered at Naivasha this 22nd Day of November, 2018
_____________________
RICHARD MWONGO
JUDGE
Delivered in the presence of:
1. John Mwangi Waweru – Appellant in person
2. Mr. Koima for the State
3. Court Clerk – Quinter Ogutu