[2017] KEELC 110 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 110 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant is the registered owner of the disputed land parcel No. 12173 Karama Adjudication Section, as evidenced by the document marked 'JMNI'. The respondent's actions of invasion and fencing were not challenged due to the respondent's failure to comply with court orders regarding the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 110 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Mwenda Ngeer; Respondent: Lydia Acici M’Thikia
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 168 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Trespass, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Trespass Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Mwenda Ngeer

Applicant

Lydia Acici M’Thikia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with land parcel No. 12173 Karama Adjudication Section.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case with a probability of success.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours the grant of the injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant is the registered owner of the disputed land parcel No. 12173 Karama Adjudication Section, as evidenced by the document marked 'JMNI'. The respondent's actions of invasion and fencing were not challenged due to the respondent's failure to comply with court orders regarding the filing of a Replying Affidavit. The court held that the applicant had established a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favoured the maintenance of the status quo. Consequently, the court granted the temporary injunction as sought, to remain in force for eight months.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the respondent, her agents, assignees, or any other persons acting on her behalf from entering, invading, trespassing, encroaching, or otherwise interfering with the applicant's ownership, occupation, possession, and use of land parcel No. 12173 Karama Adjudication...
  • Costs of the application to be in the cause.