[2019] KEELRC 1098 (KLR)
The Court found that, based on certified copies supplied by the Court to the Respondent, the Statements of Claim in all seven files were not signed at the time of filing. The Court concluded that the Claimants' Advocates attempted to remedy the default by signing some Statements of Claim after the issue was raised,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1098 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Mwenda Ali; Respondent: Kalu Works Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 380 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- claims struck out for want of formal validity
- Legal Topics
- Preliminary Objection, Unsigned Pleadings, Striking Out Claim, Court Procedure, Advocate Signature Requirement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Mwenda Ali
Applicant
Kalu Works Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Statements of Claim filed by the Claimants are valid in the absence of the Advocates' signatures.
- 2 Whether the Claims should be struck out for failure to comply with procedural requirements.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that, based on certified copies supplied by the Court to the Respondent, the Statements of Claim in all seven files were not signed at the time of filing. The Court concluded that the Claimants' Advocates attempted to remedy the default by signing some Statements of Claim after the issue was raised, but this did not cure the original defect. The absence of the Advocates' signatures at the time of filing rendered the Statements of Claim formally invalid in law. Consequently, the Court held that the Claims must be struck out for failure to comply with the mandatory procedural requirement under Rule 6(a) of the Employment & Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016.
Court Disposition
claims struck out for want of formal validity
Orders
- The 7 Claims are hereby struck out.
- Costs to the Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR
RELATIONS COURT AT MOMBASA
CAUSE NUMBER 380 OF 2018
BETWEEN
JOHN MWENDWA ALI...............................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
KALU WORKS LIMITED......................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. There are 7 related Claims, brought by Former Employees of the Respondent herein, Kalu Works Limited. The Claims are:-
i. Cause No. 380 of 2018, John Mwenda Ali v. Kalu Works Limited.
ii. Cause No. 381 of 2018, Juma Ngovi Bulushi v. Kalu Works Limited.
iii. Cause No. 382 of 2018, Hebron Santa Keah v. Kalu Works Limited.
iv. Cause No. 383 of 2018, Michael Makenzi v. Kalu Works Limited.
v. Cause No. 384 of 2018, Khamisi Kalume Dena v. Kalu Works Limited.
vi. Cause No. 385 of 2018, Kalama Chai Mdigo v. Kalu Works Limited.
vii. Cause No. 386 of 2018, Konzi Chondo Konzi v. Kalu Works Limited.
2. The Claimants seek Judgment against the Respondent for terminal benefits and compensation for unfair termination.
3. The Respondent filed Notice of Preliminary Objection on 4th February 2019. It is pointed out that the Statements of Claim filed by the Claimants in the respective files, are not signed by the Advocates for the Claimants.
4. The Respondent submits that Rule 6(a) of the Employment & Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016, requires the Statement of Claim to be signed by the Claimant or by his Advocate.
5. The Court is prayed to strike out the Statements of Claim, with costs to the Respondent.
6. The Claimants filed what they describe as ‘Response to the Respondent’s Preliminary Objection’ on 18th June 2019. They all submit that their Statements of Claim were duly signed before filing.
7. The Objection was heard on 19th June 2019.
The Court Finds:-
8. The Preliminary Objection was argued under Cause No. 380 of 2018. For the record, the Court makes the following Order before proceeding with the Ruling.
(a) The files listed at paragraph 1 of the Ruling, are consolidated, to be dealt with under Cause No. 380 of 2018.
9. At the time the Objection was argued, and Ruling prepared, the Statements of Claim in the following files did not have the signature of the Advocates for the Claimants:-
(a) Cause No. 380 of 2018.
(b) Cause No. 385 of 2018.
10. The rest of the files, 5 in all, have Statements of Claim indicated to have been signed by the Advocates for the Claimants on 26th April 2018.
11. Prior to filing the Notice of Preliminary Objection, the Respondent wrote to the Deputy Registrar asking for certified copies of the Statements of Claim in all files. These were certified and released to the Respondent.
12. Certified copies supplied by the Court to the Respondent, are all unsigned.
13. It can only be that the Claimants’ Advocates accessed the files in Court and signed some of the Statements of Claim, after the default was raised by the Respondent, in a bid to remedy the default.
14. The certified copies conclusively show that the Statements of Claim were not signed, at the time of filing.
15. The Statements of Claim filed in all the 7 files have no formal validity in law.
IT IS ORDERED:-
a) The 7 Claims are hereby struck out.
b) Costs to the Respondent.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 18th day of July 2019.
James Rika
Judge