[2008] KEHC 2156 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant was properly identified as being present in Room No. 24 at Space Haven Hotel, where the fake currency papers were found, based on the credible and consistent testimony of prosecution witnesses PW1 and PW2. The appellant failed to provide a plausible explanation for why the police...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 2156 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: John Ndungu Kirunya; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 181 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- DK Maraga
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Fake Currency, Criminal Procedure, Delay in Arraignment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Ndungu Kirunya
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was properly identified as being in possession of papers intended to resemble and pass as currency notes.
- 2 Whether the delay in presenting the appellant to court violated his constitutional rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant was properly identified as being present in Room No. 24 at Space Haven Hotel, where the fake currency papers were found, based on the credible and consistent testimony of prosecution witnesses PW1 and PW2. The appellant failed to provide a plausible explanation for why the police or witnesses would falsely implicate him. On the issue of delay in arraignment, the court held that the delay was reasonable and justified by the need to examine the papers to determine their authenticity, and the fact that the arrest occurred on a Sunday. The court concluded that there was no merit in the appeal against both conviction and sentence, and dismissed the appeal...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL APPEAL 181 OF 2007
JOHN NDUNGU KIRUNYA….………………..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………………………..,….RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
JOHN NDUNGU KIRUNYA, the Appellant was with four others charged with being in possession of papers intended to resemble and pass as currency notes contrary to Section 367A of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge were that on 9th July 2006 at Nyahururu Township in Laikipia District within Rift Valley Province, the Appellant was, jointly with four others found in possession of 481 papers which were intended to resemble and pass as KShs.1,000/- currency notes.
They all denied the charge and while the case was pending for hearing the first and fifth accused persons absconded and the charge against them was withdrawn under Section 87A of the Criminal Procedure Code. The case proceeded for hearing against the other accused persons and after full trial before the Resident Magistrate at Nyahururu they were convicted and sentenced to three years imprisonment. The Appellant has appealed against that conviction and sentence.
The Appellant's short submissions were that he was not arrested in Room No. 24 at Space Haven Hotel at Nyahururu as alleged by PW1 and PW2. According to him he was arrested while playing pool at that bar. He also raised the constitutional issue of being held for more than 24 hours before he was taken to court. He said he was arrested on the 9th July 2006 and held for 96 hours before he was taken to court on the 12th July 2006.
In his submissions, Mr. Mugambi, learned state counsel contended that the Appellant was arrested in Room No. 24 at Space Haven Hotel and not while playing pool as he claims. Regarding the delay in taking him to court he submitted that the same was caused by the time it took to examine the papers that were found with the Appellant and his confederates. He urged me to dismiss the appeal both on conviction and sentence.
I have considered these submissions and carefully read the record. Starting with the issue of delaying in taking the Appellant to court, I am satisfied that the delay was caused by the examination of the papers to ascertain whether or not they were genuine or fake currency notes. Moreover, the 9th July 2006 was a Sunday so the delay in taking the accused to court was only one day which, as I have said, was a reasonable period that the police had to arrange to have the papers examined as to whether they were genuine or fake currency.
From the evidence of PW3 there is no doubt that the papers found were intended to pass as currency notes. The Appellant does not raise any issue on that. His complaint is that he was not among the people found with those papers in Room 24 at Space Haven Hotel in Nyahururu.
Having carefully examined the evidence of PW1 and PW2, I am satisfied that the Appellant was indeed found in that room. There is no reason given why the two witnesses would have preferred the charges against the Appellant if he was not found in that room. The Appellant does not say that any of the other people he was charged with were also arrested from the bar and not from that room. He does not himself give any reason why the police would pick on him. In the circumstances I find no merit in this appeal and accordingly dismiss it.
DATED and delivered at Nakuru on this 10th day of July of 2008.
D. K. MARAGA
JUDGE