[2020] KEHC 4113 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 4113 (KLR)

The trial court erred by ordering the continued detention of the applicant in custody pending payment of the forfeited surety amount, instead of first proceeding to attach and sell the property offered as security as required by Section 131(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Since the applicant has already been in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 4113 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Ndungu Wairuri; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 20’B’ of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Trial Court Order
Outcome
application allowed; applicant released from custody forthwith
Judges
LK Kimaru
Legal Topics
Surety Liability, Bail Forfeiture, Recognizance Enforcement, Criminal Procedure Code Section 131
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Surety Liability Bail Forfeiture Recognizance Enforcement Criminal Procedure Code Section 131

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Ndungu Wairuri

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Trial Court Order

  1. 1 Whether the trial court lawfully ordered the applicant to be detained in custody pending payment of the forfeited surety amount.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to immediate release after serving more than six months in custody under Section 131(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The trial court erred by ordering the continued detention of the applicant in custody pending payment of the forfeited surety amount, instead of first proceeding to attach and sell the property offered as security as required by Section 131(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Since the applicant has already been in custody for more than six months, Section 131(4) mandates his immediate release, as this is the maximum period of lawful detention for such default. The High Court therefore revised the trial court's order and directed the applicant's release from custody forthwith.

Court Disposition

application allowed; applicant released from custody forthwith

Orders

  • The order of the trial court detaining the applicant in custody pending payment of Kshs.400,000/= is revised and set aside.
  • The applicant, John Ndungu Wairuri, is ordered released from custody forthwith.