[2014] KECA 668 (KLR)

[2014] KECA 668 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in bringing the application for extension of time to file the record of appeal was inordinate and not satisfactorily explained. The applicants failed to provide a certificate of delay or credible evidence that the delay was attributable to the court registry. The explanation offered,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KECA 668 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: John Ngari; Appellant: Joseph Njeru Ireri; Appellant: Christiano Njiru; Appellant: Njiru Mbeca; Respondent: Ndathi Mbiti
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 35 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
ARM Visram
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Discretion of Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Discretion of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Ngari

Appellant

Joseph Njeru Ireri

Appellant

Christiano Njiru

Appellant

Njiru Mbeca

Appellant

Ndathi Mbiti

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time for filing the record of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in bringing the application for extension of time to file the record of appeal was inordinate and not satisfactorily explained. The applicants failed to provide a certificate of delay or credible evidence that the delay was attributable to the court registry. The explanation offered, namely pressure of work and inadvertence by counsel and the court clerk, was deemed unreasonable and unacceptable. Applying the principles set out in Leo Sila Mutiso v. Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi, the court concluded that the application lacked merit and declined to exercise its discretion in favour of the applicants.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file the record of appeal is disallowed.
  • No order as to costs.