[2006] KEHC 1843 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant's statement of defence was not, on its face, scandalous, frivolous, or vexatious, and that it raised triable issues that should be determined at a full trial. The court emphasized that the summary power to strike out pleadings should only be exercised in plain and obvious cases,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1843 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Ngatia Karagu; Plaintiff: Johnson Githii Kingori; Plaintiff: James Muchai Ngugi (suing on behalf of Mwiki Welfare Association); Defendant: Mwiki Company Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 533 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out of Pleadings, Summary Judgment, Contractual Relationships, Statute Barred Claims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Ngatia Karagu
Plaintiff
Johnson Githii Kingori
Plaintiff
James Muchai Ngugi (suing on behalf of Mwiki Welfare Association)
Plaintiff
Mwiki Company Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's statement of defence should be struck out for being scandalous, frivolous, or vexatious.
- 2 Whether the defence raises triable issues that warrant a full trial.
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs, including the association, have a contractual relationship with the defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant's statement of defence was not, on its face, scandalous, frivolous, or vexatious, and that it raised triable issues that should be determined at a full trial. The court emphasized that the summary power to strike out pleadings should only be exercised in plain and obvious cases, and that the present case did not meet that threshold. The court further noted that the merits of the case should not be determined at this interlocutory stage, as the issues require full discovery and oral evidence. Consequently, the application to strike out the defence was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The plaintiff's application to strike out the defendant's defence is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Civil Case 533 of 2002
JOHN NGATIA KARAGU….….……………………….......................................…………….1ST PLAINTIFF
JOHNSON GITHII KINGORI..………………………...........................................……………2ND PLAINTIFF
JAMES MUCHAI NGUGI suing on behalf of MWIKI WELFARE ASSOCIATION…....3RD PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MWIKI COMPANY LTD…………………………………....................................……………. DEFENDANT
RULING
The plaintiff by way of this Chamber Summons brought under Order VI Rule 13 (i) (b) and (c) of the Civil Procedure Rules seeks orders that the defendant’s statement of defence dated 26th April 2002 be struck out for being scandalous, and frivolous and may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of this suit and that pursuant to the aforegoing judgment be entered forthwith against the defendant in terms of the plaint with appropriate directions thereof. The plaintiff also prays for costs of this application.
The application is based on the ground that the defendant has merely and spuriously denied the plaintiff’s claim, that the defence does not candidly and earnestly traverse the multifarious allegations of fact and/or law canvassed in the plaint and that the defence is a sham par excellence.
The application is opposed by the defendant who has filed replying affidavit in which he avers that the plaintiffs purchased plots in 1980 and the Mwiki Welfare Association was registered on 12th July 2001; that the plaintiffs relationship with the defendant was contractual and the Association was not a party to the contract; that the suit land reference No.8469/4 was obsolete and non-existent at the time the suit was commenced; that the suit is statute barred and that the plaintiffs’ suit offends the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules where many persons are involved.
Mr. Njagi counsel for the plaintiffs submitted that the defendant does not deny that members of the plaintiffs Association purchased and acquired rights in plots excised from LR NO. 8469/4 and that the plaintiffs took possession of the plots and that the plaintiffs only want the transfer to them of the plots they have already taken possession.
Mr. Macharia counsel for the defendants submitted that by the time those plots were purchased the said Association was not in existence and therefore there is no contractual relationship between the plaintiffs and the defendant and the plaintiffs individually and that that the plaintiffs ought to have brought this suit in their individual capacity.
He further submitted that the defence raises triable issues and that it ought not be struck out.
The exercise of this summary power to strike out a pleading is only in plain and obvious cases when the pleading in question is on the face of it unsustainable.
Counsel for the plaintiff has not convinced the court that the defence is scandalous nor frivolous or vexatious and has no substratum. At this stage as MADAN JA as he then was said in DT DOBIE & COMPANY LTD VS. JOSEPH MBARIA MUCHINA & ANOTHER CA NO. 37 OF 1978 (unreported) the court ought not to deal with any merits of the case for that is a function solely reserved for the judge at trial as the court itself is not usually fully informed so as to deal with the merits without discovery, without oral evidence tested by cross examination in the ordinary way. I find that the defence raises trial issues and therefore I decline to struck out the defendant’s defence and dismiss the plaintiff’s application with costs to the defendant.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 7th day of July 2006.
J.L.A. OSIEMO
JUDGE