[2008] KEHC 444 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in seeking reinstatement and substitution, namely the time required to obtain letters of administration and to organize the estate. The application was unopposed, and there was evidence that the deceased plaintiff had not lost...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 444 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Njoroge Kariuki; Defendant: Lucas Muchori Macharia; Defendant: Dominic Mbugua Gathia; Plaintiff: Joyce Wangari Kariuki; Plaintiff: Peter Njoroge Kariuki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 134 of 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement and Substitution of Parties
- Outcome
- application allowed; suit reinstated; substitution of plaintiffs granted
- Judges
- MM Kasango, MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Abatement of Suit, Reinstatement of Suit, Substitution of Parties, Letters of Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Njoroge Kariuki
Plaintiff
Lucas Muchori Macharia
Defendant
Dominic Mbugua Gathia
Defendant
Joyce Wangari Kariuki
Plaintiff
Peter Njoroge Kariuki
Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement and Substitution of Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be reinstated after abatement due to the death of the plaintiff.
- 2 Whether the applicants should be substituted as plaintiffs in place of the deceased plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in seeking reinstatement and substitution, namely the time required to obtain letters of administration and to organize the estate. The application was unopposed, and there was evidence that the deceased plaintiff had not lost interest in the matter prior to his death. The court exercised its discretion to reinstate the suit and substitute the applicants as plaintiffs, holding that the interests of justice would be served by allowing the matter to proceed on its merits.
Court Disposition
application allowed; suit reinstated; substitution of plaintiffs granted
Orders
- The suit is reinstated.
- Joyce Wangari Kariuki and Peter Njoroge Kariuki are substituted as plaintiffs in place of John Njoroge Kariuki, deceased.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
Civil Case 134 of 1993
JOHN NJOROGE KARIUKI ……….……..….…… PLAINTIFF
Versus
LUCAS MUCHORI MACHARIA ..……...........….. 1ST DEFENDANT
DOMINIC MBUGUA GATHIA ………..............….. 2ND DEFENDANT
RULING
The application before court is a Chamber Summons dated 27th September 2007. It is brought under Order XXIII Rules 12, 8(2) and 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The application seeks for reinstatement of this suit which abated by operation of law on or before 2nd October 2006. The defendants although served failed to attend court at the hearing and also did not file any documents in opposition. The affidavit in support of the application stated that the application is brought by the wife and son of the deceased plaintiff. The deceased plaintiff passed away on 2nd October 2005. Before his death the said plaintiff had filed this case seeking to recover land being land reference No. Nyandarua/ol Joro-orok Salient/ 3328. The son of the deceased plaintiff Peter Njoroge Kariuki one of the applicants herein filed a succession cause at High Court Nakuru being Succession Cause No. 553 of 2006. He was issued with Letters of Administration on 1st December 2006. That he and his co-applicant did not file this application immediately the grant was issued because they had not finalized the collection of the properties of the estate and had not identified the shares of the dependants. They were finally able to file this application on 24th August 2007. The applicant further deponed that the deceased plaintiff had not lost interest in this case even up to his death. That the deceased plaintiff’s advocate had previously made several attempts to fix this case for hearing but due to the congestion of the court diary the case was not fixed for hearing. Bearing in mind the applicants deposition as herein before and in view of the fact that the application is not opposed I find that the application is merited. The order of this court is that this suit be and hereby reinstated. Further the court does hereby substitute the names of Joyce Wangari Kariuki and Peter Njoroge Kariuki as the plaintiffs in place of John Njoroge Kariuki deceased. There shall be no orders to costs in respect of chamber summon dated 27th October 2007.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 27th day of October 2008.
BY
M. S. A. MAKHANDIA
JUDGE