[2017] KEELRC 421 (KLR)
The Court found that since the Respondent had not filed any response or challenged the existence of the employment relationship, and the Claimant was on fixed-term contracts with remuneration paid up to May 2017, the Claimant had established a prima facie case for injunctive relief. The Court also held that, in the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 421 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: John Njuguna Kamau; Respondent: County Government of Laikipia
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 46 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Interlocutory Application for Amendment and Injunction
- Outcome
- Interlocutory application allowed; temporary injunction granted; leave to amend granted if necessary.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Amendment of Pleadings, Fixed Term Contracts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Njuguna Kamau
Claimant
County Government of Laikipia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Interlocutory Application for Amendment and Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant should be granted leave to amend the Memorandum of Claim and enjoin additional parties.
- 2 Whether a temporary injunction restraining the Respondent from interfering with the Claimant's employment should be granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that since the Respondent had not filed any response or challenged the existence of the employment relationship, and the Claimant was on fixed-term contracts with remuneration paid up to May 2017, the Claimant had established a prima facie case for injunctive relief. The Court also held that, in the absence of a response, leave to amend the Memorandum of Claim was unnecessary, but would be granted if a response was later found. The orders sought were granted to preserve the Claimant's employment status pending the hearing and determination of the suit, and similar orders were extended to related cases for judicial economy.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory application allowed; temporary injunction granted; leave to amend granted if necessary.
Orders
- The Claimant to file and serve an Amended Memorandum of Claim on or before 15 December 2017.
- A temporary injunction is issued restraining the Respondents, their servants, agents, employees or any person duly authorized by them from replacing, removing and or interfering with the Claimant’s employment in any manner whatsoever pending hearing and determination of this suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
42 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAKURU
CAUSE NO. 46 OF 2016
JOHN NJUGUNA KAMAU.......................................CLAIMANT
v
COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF LAIKIPIA............RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Claimant instituted legal proceedings against the Respondent on 19 February 2016 and the Issues in Dispute were stated as
i. Payment of arrears
ii. Allowances
iii. Confirmation of employment.
2. The Respondent, upon service filed a Memorandum of Appearance on 19 April 2016 through the firm of Bwononga & Co. Advocates.
3. On 8 November 2017, the Claimant moved Court seeking
1. That this application be certified as urgent and the same be heard exparte in the first instance and service be dispensed with.
2. That this Honourable Court to grant leave to the Claimant to amend the Memorandum of Claim and enjoin the County Public Service Board, Laikipia County and the County Secretary, Public Service Board, Laikipia County to this Suit.
3. That this Honourable Court be pleased to grant a temporary injunction restraining the Respondents, its servants, agents, employees or any person duly authorized by them to act on their behalf from replacing, removing and or interfering with the Claimant’s employment in any manner whatsoever until the application is heard and determined.
4. That this Honourable Court be pleased to grant a temporary injunction restraining the Respondents, its servants, agents, employees or any person duly authorized by them to act on their behalf from replacing, removing and or interfering with the Claimant’s employment in any manner whatsoever pending hearing and determination of this suit.
5. That the cost of this application be provided for.
4. When the application was placed before the Court on 9 November 2017, the Court directed that it be served for hearing on 16 November 2017.
5. When the application was called out on 16 November 2017 the Respondent was not present or represented.
6. According to an affidavit of service sworn by Martin Liambila on 14 November 2017 and filed in Court on 15 November 2017, the firm of Bwononga & Co. Advocates were served and acknowledged service of the application on 10 November 2017 by stamping thereon.
7. The Court therefore allowed the application to be urged.
8. There is no Response on the file, and therefore it was not necessary for the Claimant to seek leave to amend the Memorandum of Claim.
9. If perchance a Response was filed but it is not in the file, the Court will grant the leave sought by the Claimant.
10. On the prayer seeking injunctive relief, the Court notes that the Claimant was on 3 month fixed contracts from 2013 and that the Respondent had paid his remuneration as of May 2017.
11. Considering that the Respondent has not challenged or controverted the existence of an employment relationship as of the date of hearing this application, the Court will grant the injunctive relief sought.
Orders
12. The Court hereby orders as follows
(a) The Claimant to file and serve an Amended Memorandum of Claim on or before 15 December 2017.
(b) A temporary injunction is hereby issued restraining the Respondents, its servants, agents, employees or any person duly authorized by them to act on their behalf from replacing, removing and or interfering with the Claimant’s employment in any manner whatsoever pending hearing and determination of this suit.
13. On 9 November 2017 the Court was informed that there were similar applications in Nakuru Causes Nos. 47 of 2016; 48 of 2016; 50 of 2016; 52 of 2016; 53 of 2016; 54 of 2016; 55 of 2016; 56 of 2016; 57 of 2016; 58 of 2016; 59 of 2016; 61 of 2016; 62 of 2016; 64 of 2016; 66 of 2016; 67 of 2016; 68 of 2016 and 71 of 2016.
14. The Court therefore directed that the said Causes/Files be also brought before it during the hearing of the instant application.
15. For the sake of judicial time and economy, the Court directs that similar orders as in paragraph 12 herein above be granted in those Causes/Files.
16. Costs in the Cause.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nakuru on this 17th day of November 2017.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant(s) Mr. Aim instructed by Wachira Wanjiru & Co. Advocates
For Respondent Bwononga & Co. Advocates
Court Assistant Nixon