[2019] KEELRC 2031 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2031 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed under a contract dated 15th January 2017 and was serving probation at the time of termination on 10th June 2017. As a probationary employee, the claimant was not entitled to the procedural fairness requirements of Section 41 of the Employment Act, but was entitled to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2031 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: John Oduor Osur; Respondent: Big Road Enterprises
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 764 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant in part
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Probationary Employment, House Allowance, Prorata Leave, Salary Deductions
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Probationary Employment House Allowance Prorata Leave Salary Deductions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Oduor Osur

Claimant

Big Road Enterprises

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unlawfully terminated from employment during probationary period.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to house allowance, prorata leave, and compensation for alleged underpayment and unlawful deductions.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was serving probation at the time of termination and the legal consequences thereof.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed under a contract dated 15th January 2017 and was serving probation at the time of termination on 10th June 2017. As a probationary employee, the claimant was not entitled to the procedural fairness requirements of Section 41 of the Employment Act, but was entitled to seven days' notice or wages in lieu. The respondent failed to prove that the claimant was paid a consolidated salary, so the claim for house allowance was allowed at 15% of basic salary. The claims for underpayment and unlawful deductions were dismissed for lack of proof. The court awarded the claimant seven days' salary in lieu of notice, house allowance for five months, and...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant in part

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 27,075 as itemized in the judgment.
  • The sum shall attract interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.