https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6842
The court exercised its discretion to vary the bail terms because the applicant’s advanced age, ongoing treatment at Kenyatta National Hospital, and willingness to comply with reviewed terms made the original cash bail excessive in the circumstances, and no compelling reason was shown to maintain it.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 6842 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Okello Ogutu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E021 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail/review Application Pending Determination of Preliminary Objection in a Criminal Case
- Outcome
- Application allowed; bail terms varied.
- Judges
- ["MS Shariff"]
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Bail Terms, Article 49(1)(h) Constitutional Right to Bail, Variation of Bail Terms, Preliminary Objection in Criminal Prosecution, Age and Medical Condition as Bail Considerations
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Okello Ogutu
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail/review Application Pending Determination of Preliminary Objection in a Criminal Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should vary the trial court's bail terms.
- 2 Whether the applicant was entitled to release on more reasonable bail terms pending determination of the preliminary objection.
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to vary the bail terms because the applicant’s advanced age, ongoing treatment at Kenyatta National Hospital, and willingness to comply with reviewed terms made the original cash bail excessive in the circumstances, and no compelling reason was shown to maintain it.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; bail terms varied.
Orders
- The order of the trial court made on 9th January 2026 was set aside.
- The applicant shall be released on cash bail of Kshs. 350,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Ogutu v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E021 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 6842 (KLR) (20 May 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 6842 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Makadara Miscellaneous Criminal Application E021 of 2026 MS Shariff, J May 20, 2026 Between John Okello Ogutu Applicant and Republic Respondent Ruling 1.The applicant John Okello Ogutu approached this court by way of a notice of motion dated 10.2.2026, supported by his own affidavit of even date wherein he craved for the following orders: -a.Spentb.The Honourable Court be pleased to set aside the ruling of Honourable H. Mbati dated 4/2/2026 directing the applicant to pay a cash bail of Kshs. 600,000/=and in its place order and direct the applicant to be released on more reasonable bail terms pending hearing and determination of the Preliminary Objection dated 4/2/2026 filed in Makadara Chief Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case Number MCCR E1145 of 2025.c.The Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order directing the released of the applicant on personal and/or free bond of a reasonable amount pending hearing and determination of the preliminary objection dated 4/2/2026 and filed by the applicant challenging the entire criminal prosecution of a civil and contractual dispute in the Kenyan courts despite there being an ouster clause in the Consultancy Agreement between the applicant and the company in Spain.d.The Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order directing the Officer Commanding Industrial Area Prison to release the applicant forthwith pursuant to the orders of court issued in (b) and (c) above.e.The Honourable Court be pleased to issue any other orders it may deem fit and just in the circumstance.f.Costs of this application be provided for. 2.The applicant has invoked the provisions of article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya 20210 and all enabling provisions of the law. 3.I have considered the applicant’s notice of motion dated 10/2/2026, the affidavit in support thereof sworn on even date and the annexures attached thereto. I have also considered the oral submissions of Mr. Oyugo for the applicant and Ms. Kariuki for the respondent while noting that the respondent has not filed any response yet but concedes to the reduction of cash bail from Kshs. 600,000/= to Kshs. 500,000/=. 4.It is evident from the annextures attached to the supporting affidavit that the applicant is not only elderly being 77 years old, but he is also attending treatment at Kenyatta National Hospital. He has deposed that he is willingly to abide by the reviewed bond terms in the event his application succeeds. 5.Article 49 (1) (h) enshrines the right of an accused be released on bond or bail on reasonable terms unless there exists compelling reason to decline bond. 6.Given the circumstances prevailing herein, I am inclined to allow this application and I do hereby set aside the order of the trial court made on 9th January 2026. 7.The applicant shall be released on cash bail of Kshs. 350,000/=. 8.The applicant’s son one David Oluoch Ogutu is hereby ordered to stand as the applicant’s surety upon executing a personal bond. 9.This file is hereby marked as closed. DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MAKADARA THIS 20TH DAY OF MAY, 2026.M. S. SHARIFFJUDGEIn the presence ofCourt Assistant - Annastacia.Ms Kariuki for the State.Mr. Oyugo for the applicant.John Okello Ogutu - Applicant.