[2017] KECA 416 (KLR)

[2017] KECA 416 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the appellant had exhausted the internal party dispute resolution mechanisms and had further pursued the matter before the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal. The Tribunal, after rehearing the dispute with all parties present, determined that the nomination certificate should be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KECA 416 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: John Orwa; Respondent: Orange Democratic Movement Party; Respondent: National Elections Board of ODM Party; Respondent: George Okinyi Omamba
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 215 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
J Wakiaga, SP Ouko
Legal Topics
Party Nominations, Internal Dispute Resolution, Political Parties Disputes, Nomination Certificates
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Administrative Law Party Nominations Internal Dispute Resolution Political Parties Disputes Nomination Certificates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Orwa

Appellant

Orange Democratic Movement Party

Respondent

National Elections Board of ODM Party

Respondent

George Okinyi Omamba

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to the nomination certificate for Member of County Assembly, North Kanyamkago Ward, Migori County.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st and 2nd respondents were in contempt of the Migori County ODM Elections Appeals Tribunal order.
  3. 3 Whether the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal and High Court erred in awarding the nomination certificate to the 3rd respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the appellant had exhausted the internal party dispute resolution mechanisms and had further pursued the matter before the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal. The Tribunal, after rehearing the dispute with all parties present, determined that the nomination certificate should be issued to the 3rd respondent. The High Court, upon appeal, upheld this decision. The Court of Appeal, after considering the submissions and authorities, was not persuaded that there was any merit in the appellant's case or that the lower courts and tribunals had erred in law or procedure. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • Each party will bear its own costs.