[2019] KEHC 497 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 497 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant had not explained the reasons for failing to file the record of appeal or for not prosecuting the appeal since 2017. In the absence of any explanation or action by the appellant, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, in accordance with...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 497 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: John Otieno Mboga; Respondent: Sugar Development Group; Respondent: Gordon Omondi Oyugi; Respondent: Erick Odhiambo Okeya; Respondent: Joanes Opiyo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 16 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Procedure, Record of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Procedure Record of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Otieno Mboga

Appellant

Sugar Development Group

Respondent

Gordon Omondi Oyugi

Respondent

Erick Odhiambo Okeya

Respondent

Joanes Opiyo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appellant has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the record of appeal and prosecuting the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant had not explained the reasons for failing to file the record of appeal or for not prosecuting the appeal since 2017. In the absence of any explanation or action by the appellant, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules. The court also determined that there would be no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.