[2002] KECA 65 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 65 (KLR)

The application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal is incompetent because the applicant's previous appeal to the Court of Appeal was marked as having abated. Without reinstatement of the abated appeal, there is no valid appeal to extend time for. The only recourse for the applicant is to apply for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 65 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Otira Taro; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 37 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Abatement, Reinstatement of Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Extension of Time Appeal Abatement Reinstatement of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Otira Taro

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of time to file a notice of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the application is competent given the status of the previous appeals.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal is incompetent because the applicant's previous appeal to the Court of Appeal was marked as having abated. Without reinstatement of the abated appeal, there is no valid appeal to extend time for. The only recourse for the applicant is to apply for reinstatement of the abated appeal before seeking any further extension or appeal-related relief.

Court Disposition

application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The application is struck out.