https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3780
The certificate of taxation had not been reviewed, set aside, or altered, and no reference challenging the taxation had been filed. The respondents' payment-based objections were issues that should have been raised during taxation. The court therefore held that the certificate was conclusive and entered judgment for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEELC 3780 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant/advocate: BRUCE ODENY & CO. ADVOCATES; 1st Respondent/client: JARED ODONGO ALILA; 2nd Respondent/client: PETER HABIL LISIASIA; Applicant: JOHN OWITI OGOLA; Respondent: JARED ODOGO ALILA
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E017 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Advocate Client Costs Taxation Enforcement / Ruling on Notice of Motion Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act
- Outcome
- Application allowed; judgment entered for the advocate/applicant.
- Judges
- ["E Asati"]
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Taxation, Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs, Interest on Taxed Costs, Non Attendance at Taxation, Finality of Taxation Where Unchallenged
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BRUCE ODENY & CO. ADVOCATES
Applicant/advocate
JARED ODONGO ALILA
1st Respondent/client
PETER HABIL LISIASIA
2nd Respondent/client
JOHN OWITI OGOLA
Applicant
JARED ODOGO ALILA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Advocate Client Costs Taxation Enforcement / Ruling on Notice of Motion Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should convert the certificate of taxation into a decree and judgment under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act.
- 2 Whether the respondents' alleged payment of fees defeats the application despite an unchallenged certificate of taxation.
- 3 Whether interest should accrue on the taxed costs from the date of taxation.
Ratio Decidendi
The certificate of taxation had not been reviewed, set aside, or altered, and no reference challenging the taxation had been filed. The respondents' payment-based objections were issues that should have been raised during taxation. The court therefore held that the certificate was conclusive and entered judgment for the advocate for the taxed sum with interest from the date of the certificate until payment in full.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; judgment entered for the advocate/applicant.
Orders
- The certificate of taxation was converted into judgment in favour of the advocate/applicant.
- The taxed costs shall attract interest at court rates from the date of the certificate of taxation until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
**REPUBLIC OF KENYA** **IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KISUMU** **ELCL MISC. APPLICATION NO. E017 OF 2025.** BRUCE ODENY & CO. ADVOCATES …….. APPLICANT/ADVOCATE VERSUS JARED ODONGO ALILA ….….………….… 1ST RESPONDENT/CLIENT PETER HABIL LISIASIA …………………… 2ND RESPONDENT/CLIENT (ARISING FROM KISUMU ELC (OS) NO.170 OF 2016) BETWEEN JOHN OWITI OGOLA …………………………………….…….. APPLICANT VERSUS JARED ODOGO ALILA ……………………………………… RESPONDENT **RULING** The application before court for determination is the Notice of Motion dated 6th October, 2025 brought pursuant to the provisions of Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act. The application seeks orders that; 1. The honourable court be pleased to convert the certificate of taxation issued on 29th July, 2025 into a decree and judgment together with interest from the date of taxation at court rates until payment in full. 2. Costs of the application be provided for. The application was opposed on the grounds that the Respondents had paid the entire amount of fees to the Advocate. That they paid a total of Kshs.108,000/- to the Advocate/Applicant. Attached to the application is a certificate of taxation dated 18th September, 2025 and issued on 29th September, 2025. According to the certificate of taxation, the Applicant’s costs were taxed and certified at Kshs.185,175.40 against the 1st and 2nd Respondents. The proceedings of the taxing master show that the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs dated 18th February, 2025 for Kshs.247,164.60 was presented before her for taxation. That the same was duly taxed at Kshs.185,175.40. The record also shows that the Respondents were served but did not attend the taxation. The issues that the Respondents are raising herein are issues that ought to have been raised and dealt with in the taxation. There is no Reference filed challenging the taxation. Section 51(2) pursuant to which the application was brought provides that “the certificate of the taxing officer by whom any Bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the court be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby and the court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit including in a case where the retainer is not disputed an order that judgement be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.” As the certificate of taxation remains unreviewed, the application is allowed. Judgment is entered in favour of the Advocate/Applicant in terms of the certificate of taxation. The taxed costs shall attract interest at court rates from the date of the certificate of taxation till payment in full. Each party to bear their own costs of the application. Orders accordingly. **Ruling dated and signed at Kisumu, delivered virtually this 18th day of June 2026.** **E. ASATI,** **JUDGE.** **In the presence of:** Atika - Court Assistant. Akinyi for the Applicant/Advocate. Respondents present in person.