[2004] KEHC 133 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 133 (KLR)

The court found that the order made on 15th January 2004 by Visram J vacated the earlier orders of 16th July 2003, which had been granted ex parte and were based on an interlocutory judgment that was subsequently set aside. As a result, the orders previously relied upon by the plaintiffs/respondents no longer...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] KEHC 133 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: John Oyawo Neko and three others; Defendant: Unity 45 Housing Co-operative Society Ltd.
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 1256 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Chamber Summons
Outcome
Application allowed; defendant at liberty to prosecute chamber summons.
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Interlocutory Judgment, Setting Aside Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Res Judicata Interlocutory Judgment Setting Aside Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Oyawo Neko and three others

Plaintiff

Unity 45 Housing Co-operative Society Ltd.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Chamber Summons

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's chamber summons dated 12th January 2004 is properly before the court in light of previous orders granted on 16th July 2003.
  2. 2 Whether the application is res judicata due to subsisting orders.
  3. 3 Effect of the order made on 15th January 2004 vacating earlier orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the order made on 15th January 2004 by Visram J vacated the earlier orders of 16th July 2003, which had been granted ex parte and were based on an interlocutory judgment that was subsequently set aside. As a result, the orders previously relied upon by the plaintiffs/respondents no longer subsist. The defendant/applicant is therefore entitled to prosecute its chamber summons dated 12th January 2004, as the matter is not res judicata and the parties are at liberty to proceed to trial on the substantive issues in the suit.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; defendant at liberty to prosecute chamber summons.

Orders

  • The defendant/applicant is at liberty to prosecute its chamber summons dated 12th January 2004.