[2021] KEELC 862 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had not satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution under Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as he failed to demonstrate substantial loss or provide any justification for non-compliance with the orders of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal and the court. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 862 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Ngugi Kabogo t/a Club Sidai Oleng; Respondent: John Peter Kamau Ruhangi
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E004 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Stay of Execution and Contempt Applications
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution dismissed; application for committal for contempt allowed.
- Judges
- LC Komingoi
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Contempt of Court, Business Premises Rent Tribunal Orders, Purge of Contempt
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Ngugi Kabogo t/a Club Sidai Oleng
Applicant
John Peter Kamau Ruhangi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Stay of Execution and Contempt Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the orders of 3rd May 2021 pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the respondent should be committed to civil jail for failing to purge contempt as per the court's orders of 22nd April 2021.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had not satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution under Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as he failed to demonstrate substantial loss or provide any justification for non-compliance with the orders of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal and the court. The court noted that the orders had not been appealed against and that the applicant had not purged the contempt. Consequently, the application for stay was dismissed with costs. The court found merit in the respondent's application for committal for contempt, granting the applicant a further thirty days to purge the contempt, failing which he would be liable to arrest and...
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution dismissed; application for committal for contempt allowed.
Orders
- The application dated 25th June 2021 for stay of execution is dismissed with costs to the applicant.
- The respondent is given a further thirty (30) days to purge the contempt in compliance with order (c) of the ruling of 22nd April 2021, failing which he will be liable to arrest and committal to civil jail for four (4) months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
43 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT NAIROBI
ELC MISC APP. NO. E004 OF 2020
JOHN PETER KAMAU RUHANGI........RESPONDENT
=VERSUS=
JOHN NGUGI KABOGO T/A
CLUB SIDAI OLENG..................................APPLICANT
RULING
1. Coming for determination are two applications. The notice of motion dated 25th June 2021 is brought under Section 1A, 1B 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the inherent power of the honourable court and all other enabling provisions of the law.
2. It seeks orders:-
1. Spent.
2. Spent.
3. Spent.
4. That the honourable court be pleased to stay execution of the orders of 3rd May 2021 pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
5. That the costs of this application be in the cause.
3. The grounds are on the face of the application and are set out in paragraphs (a) to (i).
4. The application is supported by the affidavit of John Ngugi Kabogo, the Respondent herein, sworn on the 25th June 2021.
5. There is also the notice of motion dated 12th July 2021 by the applicant seeking to have the respondent be committed to jail for failing to purge the contempt as per this court’s orders of 22nd April 2021.
6. On the 29th July 2021, the court directed that the two applications be heard together. It also directed that they be canvassed by way of written submissions.
7. I have considered the notice of motion dated 25th June 2021, the affidavit in support and the replying affidavit. I have also considered the rival submissions. The issue for determination is whether this application is merited.
8. On the 28th May 2020 the Business Premises Rent Tribunal issued the following orders:-
“3. c The tenant’s temporary structures on the demised premises namely Club Sidai Oleng on Land Reference NO 28177 along Kiambu Road within Nairobi City County to be removed and or demolished”.
9. When the Respondent John Ngugi Kabogo did not comply with the said orders the Applicant moved to this court under the notice of motion dated 13th July 2020. The court on its ruling of 22nd April 2021 granted the following orders:-
“(a) That the Respondent is found guilty of disobeying the orders issued by the Business Premises Rent Tribunal on 28th May 2020.
(b) That the Respondent is given sixty (60) days to purge the said contempt failure to which
(c) The respondent is fined Kshs.200,000/- in default to serve four (4) months imprisonment.
(d) That the OCS Muthaiga police station is directed to arrest one John Ngugi Kabogo and present the said John Ngugi Kabogo for purposes of committal to civil jail.
(e) That costs of this application be borne by the Respondent”.
10. It should be noted that todate the Respondent has not purged the said contempt nor has he complied with order No (c) of the Ruling.
11. I have gone through his supplementary affidavit sworn on the 25th June 2021. There is no single paragraph which mitigates the failure by the Respondent to purge the contempt. He has not given any justifiable reason as to why he has not complied with the orders of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal. The orders of Business Premises Rent Tribunal have not been appealed against.
12. The orders of 22nd April 2021 have not been appealed against. The Respondent’s application has failed to satisfy the conditions set out under order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
13. I find no merit in this application and the same is dismissed with costs to the Applicant.
14. Consequently, I find merit in the notice of motion dated 12th July 2021. The Respondent is given a further thirty (30) days to purge the contempt in compliance of order NO (c) failure to which, he will be liable to be arrested and committed to civil jail for a period of four (4) months.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN NAIROBI ON THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021.
……………………….
L. KOMINGOI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Mr. Ng’ang’a for the Applicant
No appearance of the Respondent
Steve – Court Assistant