[2021] KEELC 862 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 862 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution under Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as he failed to demonstrate substantial loss or provide any justification for non-compliance with the orders of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal and the court. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 862 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Ngugi Kabogo t/a Club Sidai Oleng; Respondent: John Peter Kamau Ruhangi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E004 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Stay of Execution and Contempt Applications
Outcome
Application for stay of execution dismissed; application for committal for contempt allowed.
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Contempt of Court, Business Premises Rent Tribunal Orders, Purge of Contempt
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Contempt of Court Business Premises Rent Tribunal Orders Purge of Contempt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Ngugi Kabogo t/a Club Sidai Oleng

Applicant

John Peter Kamau Ruhangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Stay of Execution and Contempt Applications

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the orders of 3rd May 2021 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be committed to civil jail for failing to purge contempt as per the court's orders of 22nd April 2021.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution under Order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as he failed to demonstrate substantial loss or provide any justification for non-compliance with the orders of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal and the court. The court noted that the orders had not been appealed against and that the applicant had not purged the contempt. Consequently, the application for stay was dismissed with costs. The court found merit in the respondent's application for committal for contempt, granting the applicant a further thirty days to purge the contempt, failing which he would be liable to arrest and...

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution dismissed; application for committal for contempt allowed.

Orders

  • The application dated 25th June 2021 for stay of execution is dismissed with costs to the applicant.
  • The respondent is given a further thirty (30) days to purge the contempt in compliance with order (c) of the ruling of 22nd April 2021, failing which he will be liable to arrest and committal to civil jail for four (4) months.