[2022] KEELC 597 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 597 (KLR)

The court found that the respondents unlawfully interred the remains of Teresia Gathoni on the applicant's land in violation of prior court orders. The respondents failed to raise any new issues or provide a substantive defense to the application. In view of the judgment in ELC 588 of 2014, which was in favour of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 597 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Thuo Kiragu (suing on behalf of Jonathan Kiambati, David Chege & Mercy Emily Wanjiru as Donors); Respondent: Stephen Chiira Karanja; Respondent: Thuo Gathoni; Respondent: Karogo Gathoni; Respondent: County Government of Kiambu; Respondent: Public Health Officer Kiambu; Respondent: Office of the Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E086 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Exhumation Orders, Unlawful Burial, Injunctive Relief, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Exhumation Orders Unlawful Burial Injunctive Relief Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Thuo Kiragu (suing on behalf of Jonathan Kiambati, David Chege & Mercy Emily Wanjiru as Donors)

Applicant

Stephen Chiira Karanja

Respondent

Thuo Gathoni

Respondent

Karogo Gathoni

Respondent

County Government of Kiambu

Respondent

Public Health Officer Kiambu

Respondent

Office of the Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the respondents unlawfully interred the remains of Teresia Gathoni on the applicant's land contrary to court orders.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to orders for exhumation and removal of the remains from the suit property.
  3. 3 Whether the relevant authorities should be compelled to issue an exhumation permit and supervise the process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents unlawfully interred the remains of Teresia Gathoni on the applicant's land in violation of prior court orders. The respondents failed to raise any new issues or provide a substantive defense to the application. In view of the judgment in ELC 588 of 2014, which was in favour of the applicant, and the absence of any justification for the respondents' actions, the court held that the applicant was entitled to the orders sought. The court ordered the respondents to remove and/or exhume the remains within thirty days, failing which the applicant could do so. The relevant authorities were directed to issue the necessary exhumation permit and supervise the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents are ordered to remove and/or exhume the remains of Teresia Gathoni (deceased) unlawfully interred on land parcel Limuru/Kamirithu/380 within thirty (30) days from the date of judgment.
  • In default, the applicant is at liberty to remove and/or exhume the said remains and take them to the nearest mortuary.