Maskini alias John Manyonge Kundu v Republic (Criminal Application E053 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 10707 (KLR) (16 July 2026) (Ruling)

Maskini alias John Manyonge Kundu v Republic (Criminal Application E053 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 10707 (KLR) (16 July 2026) (Ruling)

The application succeeded because section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory, the sentencing record showed the trial court failed to credit the applicant’s remand custody, and the applicant had spent 7 months in custody before sentencing, which had to be factored into the four-year sentence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 10707 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Wafula Maskini alias John Manyonge Kundu; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application E053 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Review/application to Factor Remand Period Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["E Ominde"]
Legal Topics
Remand Custody Credit, Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code, Sentence Computation, Stealing Stock/handling Stolen Property
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Procedure Remand Custody Credit Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code Sentence Computation Stealing Stock/handling Stolen Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Wafula Maskini alias John Manyonge Kundu

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Review/application to Factor Remand Period Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code

  1. 1 Whether the court should factor the applicant’s remand custody period into his sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court failed to account for the remand period when imposing the four-year sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The application succeeded because section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory, the sentencing record showed the trial court failed to credit the applicant’s remand custody, and the applicant had spent 7 months in custody before sentencing, which had to be factored into the four-year sentence.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • The period of 7 months spent in remand custody shall be factored into the applicant’s 4-year sentence.
  • Right of appeal: 14 days.