[2013] KEHC 5161 (KLR)
The court found that no evidence had been presented to demonstrate malice or bad faith on the part of the IEBC or the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal in their decision regarding the party nomination for Kimilili Constituency. The court emphasized the independence of these quasi-judicial bodies and held that it...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5161 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Wanyonyi Wenyaa; Respondent: Nicholas Simiyu; Respondent: Benjamin Mwema; Respondent: New Ford Kenya; Respondent: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 91 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Tribunal Decisions, Party Nominations, Independence of Iecb, Quasi Judicial Bodies
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Wanyonyi Wenyaa
Applicant
Nicholas Simiyu
Respondent
Benjamin Mwema
Respondent
New Ford Kenya
Respondent
Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court can interfere with the decision of the IEBC and Political Parties Disputes Tribunal regarding party nominations.
- 2 Whether sufficient evidence of malice or bad faith was presented to warrant setting aside the consent or decision in question.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that no evidence had been presented to demonstrate malice or bad faith on the part of the IEBC or the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal in their decision regarding the party nomination for Kimilili Constituency. The court emphasized the independence of these quasi-judicial bodies and held that it would not interfere with their decisions in the absence of compelling evidence of impropriety. Consequently, the application to stay and revoke the tribunal's decision was dismissed, and the court declined to set aside the alleged consent or decision.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)
Petition 91 of 2013 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>
14. 00
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; line-height:115%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif";} </style> <![endif]
JOHN WANYONYI WENYAA..............................................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
NICHOLAS SIMIYU...................................................................................1ST RESPONDENT
BENJAMIN MWEMA...............................................................................2ND RESPONDENT
NEW FORD KENYA.................................................................................3RD RESPONDENT
INDEPENDENT ELECTROAL& BOUNDARIES COMMISSION........4TH RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. The Plaint herein was filed in court together with a Notice of Motion dated 7th February 2013 seeking that a consent/decision entered into by the Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission(IEBC) and Political Parties Disputes Tribunal Number 181 of 2013 be stayed and finally revoked.
2. The suit and application are based on the grounds set out herein among them that the Applicant was duly nominated as Member of Parliament aspirant for Kimilili Constituency on the ticket of Ford Kenya Party. It is alleged that due to acts of fraud by the Secretary General of the said party and the 1st Defendant, the IEBC Tribunal decided that the 1st Defendant be the aspirant for the party in that Constituency. This court is now asked to reverse that decision.
3. I will not write a long Ruling in this matter. This court acknowledges that the IEBC Tribunal and the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal are quasi judicial bodies which have specific mandate under the various authorizing Acts. This court respects their decisions when made in good faith. It is alleged by the Petitioner that there was no nomination carried out in Kimilili Constituency by the Party but the 1st Respondent was declared the winner nonetheless.
It is beyond the scope of this court to enquire into party nominations, but this court can review the decisions taken by Independent Tribunals under Article 165 (6) of the Constitution.
4. On their part Mr. Nyamogo for IEBC stated that the dispute arises from the political party’s primaries to which the IEBC was not a party.
5. For the party there are two conflicting positions – one taken by the alleged Executive Officer of the Party, Captain Wafuba who supports the Petitioner, and the other taken by Mr. Mwema who states he is the Secretary General of the Party.
6. Having considered the application I am satisfied that no evidence has been placed before this occur to enable this court interfere with the IEBC decision. Further, the alleged consent if it is indeed there cannot be set aside by this court, unless malice or bad faith is shown.
7. In my Ruling this is a matter where the court must decline to interfere with the independence of the IEBC in the decision which it has taken. The application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
It is so ordered.
DATED, READ AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBITHIS 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013
E. K. O. OGOLA
JUDGE
PRESENT:
Wanyanga for the Petitioner
Nyamodi for the IEBC
Isoe for the 1st Respondent
Teresia – Court Clerk